CAESAR II VS OpenFOAM
As of 30 October 2026, OpenFOAM is named by 120 companies and CAESAR II by 131; CAESAR II skews to companies under 200 people (27% vs 54%), OpenFOAM to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 39%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CAESAR II's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, OpenFOAM rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CAESAR II: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- OpenFOAM: 2–200 employees
- 54%
- CAESAR II: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- OpenFOAM: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CAESAR II | share | OpenFOAM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 6% | 19 | 16% | OpenFOAM |
| 11-50 employees | 12 | 9% | 18 | 15% | OpenFOAM |
| 51-200 employees | 16 | 12% | 28 | 23% | OpenFOAM |
| 201-500 employees | 22 | 17% | 9 | 8% | CAESAR II |
| 501-1000 employees | 19 | 15% | 7 | 6% | CAESAR II |
| 1001-5000 employees | 17 | 13% | 8 | 7% | CAESAR II |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 9% | 9 | 8% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 22 | 17% | 18 | 15% | even |
| Segment | CAESAR II | share | OpenFOAM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 65 | 50% | 18 | 15% | CAESAR II |
| Manufacturing & industry | 27 | 21% | 40 | 33% | OpenFOAM |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 18 | 14% | 8 | 7% | CAESAR II |
| Property & construction | 10 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Technology & software | 3 | 2% | 21 | 18% | OpenFOAM |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 8 | 7% | OpenFOAM |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 9 | 8% | OpenFOAM |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 9 | 8% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CAESAR II | share | OpenFOAM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 79 | 60% | 64 | 53% | CAESAR II |
| France | 9 | 7% | 8 | 7% | even |
| Canada | 8 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 6% | 6 | 5% | even |
| India | 5 | 4% | 6 | 5% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 4 | 3% | 1 | 1% | CAESAR II |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 3 | 2% | 16 | 13% | OpenFOAM |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| AZ | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CAESAR II | share | OpenFOAM | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 460 | 93% | 206 | 50% | CAESAR II |
| Skilled trades and field service | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 2 | 0% | 52 | 13% | OpenFOAM |
| IT operations & business systems | 2 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Software engineering | 1 | 0% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Research and science | – | – | 32 | 8% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 16 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CAESAR II →
Companies using OpenFOAM →
cae simulation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
OpenFOAM is named by 120 companies in job postings and CAESAR II by 131; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/caesar-ii-vs-openfoam)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CAESAR II vs OpenFOAM: questions
Which is more used, CAESAR II or OpenFOAM?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CAESAR II (131) over OpenFOAM (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, OpenFOAM (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CAESAR II?
27% of CAESAR II companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 54% for OpenFOAM. 39% of CAESAR II companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for OpenFOAM.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually CAESAR II in marketing and OpenFOAM in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CAESAR II or OpenFOAM. Start free, no card.