Cameo Systems Modeler VS MagicDraw
As of 30 October 2026, MagicDraw is named by 120 companies and Cameo Systems Modeler by 316; Cameo Systems Modeler skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 43%), MagicDraw to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 29%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cameo Systems Modeler's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, MagicDraw rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cameo Systems Modeler: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- MagicDraw: 2–200 employees
- 43%
- Cameo Systems Modeler: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- MagicDraw: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 9.1 · 5.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cameo Systems Modeler | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 15 | 5% | 6 | 5% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 45 | 14% | 17 | 14% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 82 | 26% | 28 | 23% | Cameo Systems Modeler |
| 201-500 employees | 55 | 17% | 22 | 18% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 25 | 8% | 6 | 5% | Cameo Systems Modeler |
| 1001-5000 employees | 40 | 13% | 18 | 15% | MagicDraw |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 39 | 12% | 18 | 15% | MagicDraw |
| Segment | Cameo Systems Modeler | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 134 | 42% | 51 | 43% | even |
| Technology & software | 83 | 26% | 32 | 27% | even |
| Business & finance services | 49 | 16% | 20 | 17% | even |
| Automotive | 13 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 12 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 7 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 3 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cameo Systems Modeler | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 256 | 81% | 103 | 86% | MagicDraw |
| United Kingdom | 12 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Germany | 11 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| France | 11 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| India | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 1 | 0% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Cameo Systems Modeler | share | MagicDraw | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 2,523 | 74% | 641 | 77% | MagicDraw |
| Software engineering | 294 | 9% | 57 | 7% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 146 | 4% | 38 | 5% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 59 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 28 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 22 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 17 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 6 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cameo Systems Modeler →
Companies using MagicDraw →
requirements mbse ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
MagicDraw is named by 120 companies in job postings and Cameo Systems Modeler by 316; 148 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cameo-systems-modeler-vs-magicdraw)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cameo Systems Modeler vs MagicDraw: questions
Which is more used, Cameo Systems Modeler or MagicDraw?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Cameo Systems Modeler (316) over MagicDraw (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, MagicDraw (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cameo Systems Modeler?
45% of Cameo Systems Modeler companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 43% for MagicDraw. 29% of Cameo Systems Modeler companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for MagicDraw.
Do companies run both?
148 companies name both in their postings, usually Cameo Systems Modeler in marketing and MagicDraw in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cameo Systems Modeler or MagicDraw. Start free, no card.