Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Camunda VS FileMaker

As of 30 October 2026, FileMaker is named by 100 companies and Camunda by 194; Camunda skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 49%), FileMaker to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 38%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Camunda's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, FileMaker rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Camunda: 2–200 employees
39%
FileMaker: 2–200 employees
49%
Camunda: 1,000+ employees
38%
FileMaker: 1,000+ employees
27%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.0 · 2.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
194companies name Camunda
100companies name FileMaker
0name both
586 · 228postings in 90 days, Camunda · FileMaker
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCamundashareFileMakershareLeans
Self-employed21%––outside top 12
2-10 employees105%1212%FileMaker
11-50 employees2814%2020%FileMaker
51-200 employees3820%1717%Camunda
201-500 employees2513%1313%even
501-1000 employees189%1111%even
1001-5000 employees3015%88%Camunda
5001-10000 employees126%77%even
10,001+ employees3116%1212%Camunda
By industry
SegmentCamundashareFileMakershareLeans
Technology & software9851%1212%Camunda
Business & finance services5830%88%Camunda
Utilities & infrastructure84%33%even
Consumer services & leisure63%99%FileMaker
Public, community & associations53%1919%FileMaker
Manufacturing & industry53%1515%FileMaker
Media & content42%1010%FileMaker
Commerce & trade32%44%FileMaker
Health care21%99%FileMaker
Property & construction21%66%FileMaker
Transport, logistics & rental21%––outside top 12
Automotive11%22%even
Hospitality & travel––22%outside top 12
By country
SegmentCamundashareFileMakershareLeans
United States7740%7676%FileMaker
Germany2915%55%Camunda
United Kingdom147%22%Camunda
Poland84%––outside top 12
Switzerland74%––outside top 12
France74%11%Camunda
Canada63%66%FileMaker
Spain63%––outside top 12
Denmark42%11%even
Romania42%––outside top 12
Austria32%––outside top 12
Netherlands32%11%even
Italy––33%outside top 12
Sweden––22%outside top 12
Australia––11%outside top 12
Belgium––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCamundashareFileMakershareLeans
Software engineering43553%237%Camunda
IT operations & business systems10413%124%Camunda
Product, program & project management486%237%even
Data & AI223%––outside top 12
Sales192%103%even
General management & consulting182%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)142%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk40%––outside top 12
Customer service & success30%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting20%134%FileMaker
Human resources20%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications20%––outside top 12
Administration & office––309%outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport––175%outside top 12
Research and science––155%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––113%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––103%outside top 12
Education & training––62%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––62%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

FileMaker is named by 100 companies in job postings and Camunda by 194; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/camunda-vs-filemaker)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Camunda vs FileMaker: questions

Which is more used, Camunda or FileMaker?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Camunda (194) over FileMaker (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, FileMaker (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Camunda?

39% of Camunda companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for FileMaker. 38% of Camunda companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for FileMaker.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Camunda in marketing and FileMaker in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Camunda or FileMaker. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market