Camunda VS Microsoft Dataverse
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Dataverse is named by 679 companies and Camunda by 194; Camunda skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 31%), Microsoft Dataverse to companies over 1,000 (46% vs 38%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Camunda's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Dataverse rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Camunda: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Microsoft Dataverse: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- Camunda: 1,000+ employees
- 38%
- Microsoft Dataverse: 1,000+ employees
- 46%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Camunda | share | Microsoft Dataverse | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 5% | 22 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 28 | 14% | 69 | 10% | Camunda |
| 51-200 employees | 38 | 20% | 121 | 18% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 25 | 13% | 83 | 12% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 18 | 9% | 73 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 30 | 15% | 136 | 20% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 6% | 47 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 31 | 16% | 126 | 19% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Segment | Camunda | share | Microsoft Dataverse | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 98 | 51% | 221 | 33% | Camunda |
| Business & finance services | 58 | 30% | 146 | 22% | Camunda |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 8 | 4% | 38 | 6% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 3% | 20 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 3% | 29 | 4% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 5 | 3% | 110 | 16% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 25 | 4% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 38 | 6% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Camunda | share | Microsoft Dataverse | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 77 | 40% | 340 | 50% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Germany | 29 | 15% | 48 | 7% | Camunda |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 7% | 53 | 8% | even |
| Poland | 8 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 7 | 4% | 12 | 2% | even |
| France | 7 | 4% | 19 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 37 | 5% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Spain | 6 | 3% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 4 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Romania | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 3 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 3 | 2% | 20 | 3% | even |
| Australia | – | – | 25 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 19 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Camunda | share | Microsoft Dataverse | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 435 | 53% | 1,037 | 37% | Camunda |
| IT operations & business systems | 104 | 13% | 828 | 30% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Product, program & project management | 48 | 6% | 49 | 2% | Camunda |
| Data & AI | 22 | 3% | 304 | 11% | Microsoft Dataverse |
| Sales | 19 | 2% | 30 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 18 | 2% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 14 | 2% | 19 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 4 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 8 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 2 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 18 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Camunda →
Companies using Microsoft Dataverse →
low code bpm rpa ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Dataverse is named by 679 companies in job postings and Camunda by 194; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/camunda-vs-microsoft-dataverse)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Camunda vs Microsoft Dataverse: questions
Which is more used, Camunda or Microsoft Dataverse?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Dataverse (679) over Camunda (194). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Dataverse (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Camunda?
39% of Camunda companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 31% for Microsoft Dataverse. 38% of Camunda companies have over 1,000 employees, against 46% for Microsoft Dataverse.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Camunda in marketing and Microsoft Dataverse in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Camunda or Microsoft Dataverse. Start free, no card.