Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Camunda VS Microsoft Power Pages

As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Power Pages is named by 135 companies and Camunda by 194; Camunda skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 40%), Microsoft Power Pages to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 38%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Camunda's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Power Pages rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Camunda: 2–200 employees
39%
Microsoft Power Pages: 2–200 employees
40%
Camunda: 1,000+ employees
38%
Microsoft Power Pages: 1,000+ employees
34%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.0 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 674
194companies name Camunda
135companies name Microsoft Power Pages
0name both
586 · 437postings in 90 days, Camunda · Microsoft Power Pages
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PagesshareLeans
Self-employed21%11%even
2-10 employees105%54%even
11-50 employees2814%1713%even
51-200 employees3820%3224%Microsoft Power Pages
201-500 employees2513%1813%even
501-1000 employees189%1612%Microsoft Power Pages
1001-5000 employees3015%2116%even
5001-10000 employees126%54%Camunda
10,001+ employees3116%2015%even
By industry
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PagesshareLeans
Technology & software9851%6447%Camunda
Business & finance services5830%2216%Camunda
Utilities & infrastructure84%64%even
Consumer services & leisure63%54%even
Public, community & associations53%97%Microsoft Power Pages
Manufacturing & industry53%1511%Microsoft Power Pages
Media & content42%21%even
Commerce & trade32%21%even
Health care21%21%even
Property & construction21%54%Microsoft Power Pages
Transport, logistics & rental21%––outside top 12
Automotive11%11%even
Hospitality & travel––11%outside top 12
By country
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PagesshareLeans
United States7740%5641%even
Germany2915%64%Camunda
United Kingdom147%129%even
Poland84%43%even
Switzerland74%32%even
France74%32%even
Canada63%118%Microsoft Power Pages
Spain63%32%even
Denmark42%––outside top 12
Romania42%––outside top 12
Austria32%––outside top 12
Netherlands32%––outside top 12
Australia––97%outside top 12
India––64%outside top 12
Norway––43%outside top 12
Sweden––43%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PagesshareLeans
Software engineering43553%24547%Camunda
IT operations & business systems10413%14829%Microsoft Power Pages
Product, program & project management486%102%Camunda
Data & AI223%122%even
Sales192%31%even
General management & consulting182%71%even
Engineering (non-software)142%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk40%10%even
Customer service & success30%10%even
Finance & accounting20%––outside top 12
Human resources20%––outside top 12
Marketing & communications20%10%even
Business development & strategy––20%outside top 12
Design & UX––20%outside top 12
Construction and civil––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Microsoft Power Pages is named by 135 companies in job postings and Camunda by 194; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/camunda-vs-microsoft-power-pages)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Camunda vs Microsoft Power Pages: questions

Which is more used, Camunda or Microsoft Power Pages?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Camunda (194) over Microsoft Power Pages (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Power Pages (674 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Camunda?

39% of Camunda companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 40% for Microsoft Power Pages. 38% of Camunda companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for Microsoft Power Pages.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Camunda in marketing and Microsoft Power Pages in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Camunda or Microsoft Power Pages. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market