Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · low code bpm rpa

Camunda VS Microsoft Power Platform

As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Power Platform is named by 2,289 companies and Camunda by 194; Camunda skews to companies under 200 people (39% vs 28%), Microsoft Power Platform to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 38%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Camunda's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Power Platform rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Camunda: 2–200 employees
39%
Microsoft Power Platform: 2–200 employees
28%
Camunda: 1,000+ employees
38%
Microsoft Power Platform: 1,000+ employees
45%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.0 · 3.9
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
194companies name Camunda
2,289companies name Microsoft Power Platform
0name both
586 · 8,861postings in 90 days, Camunda · Microsoft Power Platform
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
Self-employed21%110%even
2-10 employees105%793%even
11-50 employees2814%2069%Camunda
51-200 employees3820%35816%Camunda
201-500 employees2513%33715%even
501-1000 employees189%26812%Microsoft Power Platform
1001-5000 employees3015%46820%Microsoft Power Platform
5001-10000 employees126%1527%even
10,001+ employees3116%41018%even
By industry
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
Technology & software9851%61227%Camunda
Business & finance services5830%53423%Camunda
Utilities & infrastructure84%1155%even
Consumer services & leisure63%723%even
Public, community & associations53%803%even
Manufacturing & industry53%43719%Microsoft Power Platform
Media & content42%362%even
Commerce & trade32%904%Microsoft Power Platform
Health care21%643%even
Property & construction21%1195%Microsoft Power Platform
Transport, logistics & rental21%492%even
Automotive11%542%even
By country
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
United States7740%1,13249%Microsoft Power Platform
Germany2915%2119%Camunda
United Kingdom147%1928%even
Poland84%––outside top 12
Switzerland74%372%even
France74%763%even
Canada63%994%even
Spain63%331%even
Denmark42%281%even
Romania42%––outside top 12
Austria32%––outside top 12
Netherlands32%532%even
Australia––743%outside top 12
India––462%outside top 12
Belgium––321%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCamundashareMicrosoft Power PlatformshareLeans
Software engineering43553%2,63025%Camunda
IT operations & business systems10413%3,09629%Microsoft Power Platform
Product, program & project management486%3904%Camunda
Data & AI223%1,15111%Microsoft Power Platform
Sales192%2092%even
General management & consulting182%2652%even
Engineering (non-software)142%1842%even
Legal, compliance & risk40%500%even
Customer service & success30%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting20%2382%even
Human resources20%490%even
Marketing & communications20%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––651%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––520%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Microsoft Power Platform is named by 2,289 companies in job postings and Camunda by 194; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/camunda-vs-microsoft-power-platform)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Camunda vs Microsoft Power Platform: questions

Which is more used, Camunda or Microsoft Power Platform?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Power Platform (2,289) over Camunda (194). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Power Platform (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Camunda?

39% of Camunda companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 28% for Microsoft Power Platform. 38% of Camunda companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for Microsoft Power Platform.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Camunda in marketing and Microsoft Power Platform in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Camunda or Microsoft Power Platform. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market