CAN FD VS CANopen
As of 30 October 2026, CANopen is named by 135 companies and CAN FD by 132; CAN FD skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 44%), CANopen to companies over 1,000 (31% vs 39%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CAN FD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, CANopen rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CAN FD: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- CANopen: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- CAN FD: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- CANopen: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.5 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CAN FD | share | CANopen | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 9% | 13 | 10% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 13 | 10% | 17 | 13% | CANopen |
| 51-200 employees | 25 | 19% | 29 | 21% | CANopen |
| 201-500 employees | 19 | 14% | 23 | 17% | CANopen |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 8% | 11 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 14 | 11% | 14 | 10% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 5% | 8 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 23% | 20 | 15% | CAN FD |
| Segment | CAN FD | share | CANopen | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 48 | 36% | 84 | 62% | CANopen |
| Automotive | 31 | 23% | 7 | 5% | CAN FD |
| Technology & software | 28 | 21% | 15 | 11% | CAN FD |
| Business & finance services | 12 | 9% | 8 | 6% | CAN FD |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | CAN FD |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 2% | 6 | 4% | CANopen |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CAN FD | share | CANopen | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 55% | 54 | 40% | CAN FD |
| Germany | 11 | 8% | 19 | 14% | CANopen |
| France | 9 | 7% | 6 | 4% | CAN FD |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 5% | 7 | 5% | even |
| India | 5 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 4 | 3% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Türkiye | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 6 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| TH | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CAN FD | share | CANopen | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 233 | 39% | 132 | 39% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 214 | 36% | 136 | 40% | CANopen |
| IT operations & business systems | 21 | 4% | 3 | 1% | CAN FD |
| Sales | 8 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 4 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 2 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CAN FD →
Companies using CANopen →
iot platforms protocols ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
CANopen is named by 135 companies in job postings and CAN FD by 132; 8 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/can-fd-vs-canopen)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CAN FD vs CANopen: questions
Which is more used, CAN FD or CANopen?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CANopen (135) over CAN FD (132). By website-and-DNS footprint, CANopen (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CAN FD?
38% of CAN FD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for CANopen. 39% of CAN FD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 31% for CANopen.
Do companies run both?
8 companies name both in their postings, usually CAN FD in marketing and CANopen in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CAN FD or CANopen. Start free, no card.