Celery VS IBM MQ
As of 30 October 2026, IBM MQ is named by 471 companies and Celery by 353; Celery skews to companies under 200 people (63% vs 32%), IBM MQ to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Celery's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, IBM MQ rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Celery: 2–200 employees
- 63%
- IBM MQ: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- Celery: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- IBM MQ: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 4.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Celery | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 9 | 3% | 6 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 42 | 12% | 21 | 4% | Celery |
| 11-50 employees | 85 | 24% | 51 | 11% | Celery |
| 51-200 employees | 94 | 27% | 79 | 17% | Celery |
| 201-500 employees | 34 | 10% | 64 | 14% | IBM MQ |
| 501-1000 employees | 22 | 6% | 38 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 35 | 10% | 88 | 19% | IBM MQ |
| 5001-10000 employees | 14 | 4% | 32 | 7% | IBM MQ |
| 10,001+ employees | 18 | 5% | 92 | 20% | IBM MQ |
| Segment | Celery | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 231 | 65% | 234 | 50% | Celery |
| Business & finance services | 55 | 16% | 163 | 35% | IBM MQ |
| Media & content | 16 | 5% | 9 | 2% | Celery |
| Manufacturing & industry | 15 | 4% | 18 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 8 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 6 | 2% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Celery | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 224 | 63% | 271 | 58% | Celery |
| United Kingdom | 18 | 5% | 33 | 7% | even |
| India | 18 | 5% | 10 | 2% | Celery |
| Germany | 15 | 4% | 19 | 4% | even |
| France | 13 | 4% | 21 | 4% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 2% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 5 | 1% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 5 | 1% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | 4 | 1% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Czechia | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 11 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Celery | share | IBM MQ | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 816 | 80% | 2,020 | 59% | Celery |
| Data & AI | 108 | 11% | 64 | 2% | Celery |
| IT operations & business systems | 15 | 1% | 567 | 16% | IBM MQ |
| Engineering (non-software) | 8 | 1% | 41 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 0% | 59 | 2% | even |
| Unclassified | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 10 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 9 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Celery →
Companies using IBM MQ →
message brokers streaming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
IBM MQ is named by 471 companies in job postings and Celery by 353; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/celery-vs-ibm-mq)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Celery vs IBM MQ: questions
Which is more used, Celery or IBM MQ?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, IBM MQ (471) over Celery (353). By website-and-DNS footprint, IBM MQ (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Celery?
63% of Celery companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 32% for IBM MQ. 19% of Celery companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for IBM MQ.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Celery in marketing and IBM MQ in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Celery or IBM MQ. Start free, no card.