Celonis VS Microsoft Power Pages
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Power Pages is named by 135 companies and Celonis by 139; Celonis skews to companies under 200 people (18% vs 40%), Microsoft Power Pages to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 68%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Celonis's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Power Pages rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Celonis: 2–200 employees
- 18%
- Microsoft Power Pages: 2–200 employees
- 40%
- Celonis: 1,000+ employees
- 68%
- Microsoft Power Pages: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 5.1 · 3.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 674
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Celonis | share | Microsoft Power Pages | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 6% | 5 | 4% | Celonis |
| 11-50 employees | 10 | 7% | 17 | 13% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| 51-200 employees | 7 | 5% | 32 | 24% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| 201-500 employees | 5 | 4% | 18 | 13% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 11% | 16 | 12% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 30 | 22% | 21 | 16% | Celonis |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 9% | 5 | 4% | Celonis |
| 10,001+ employees | 51 | 37% | 20 | 15% | Celonis |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Celonis | share | Microsoft Power Pages | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 47 | 34% | 15 | 11% | Celonis |
| Business & finance services | 32 | 23% | 22 | 16% | Celonis |
| Technology & software | 26 | 19% | 64 | 47% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 8 | 6% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 5% | 2 | 1% | Celonis |
| Media & content | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 9 | 7% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 5 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Celonis | share | Microsoft Power Pages | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 52 | 37% | 56 | 41% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Germany | 34 | 24% | 6 | 4% | Celonis |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 11% | 12 | 9% | even |
| Netherlands | 9 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 5 | 4% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Austria | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 3 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 9 | 7% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 11 | 8% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 6 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Celonis | share | Microsoft Power Pages | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| General management & consulting | 140 | 16% | 7 | 1% | Celonis |
| Sales | 132 | 15% | 3 | 1% | Celonis |
| Data & AI | 102 | 12% | 12 | 2% | Celonis |
| IT operations & business systems | 80 | 9% | 148 | 29% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Finance & accounting | 37 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 37 | 4% | 245 | 47% | Microsoft Power Pages |
| Product, program & project management | 28 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 21 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 16 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 12 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 9 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Celonis →
Companies using Microsoft Power Pages →
low code bpm rpa ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Power Pages is named by 135 companies in job postings and Celonis by 139; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/celonis-vs-microsoft-power-pages)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Celonis vs Microsoft Power Pages: questions
Which is more used, Celonis or Microsoft Power Pages?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Celonis (139) over Microsoft Power Pages (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Power Pages (674 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Celonis?
18% of Celonis companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 40% for Microsoft Power Pages. 68% of Celonis companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for Microsoft Power Pages.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Celonis in marketing and Microsoft Power Pages in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Celonis or Microsoft Power Pages. Start free, no card.