Check Point VS FortiManager
As of 30 October 2026, FortiManager is named by 103 companies and Check Point by 441; Check Point skews to companies under 200 people (32% vs 27%), FortiManager to companies over 1,000 (37% vs 47%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Check Point's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, FortiManager rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Check Point: 2–200 employees
- 32%
- FortiManager: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Check Point: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- FortiManager: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.7 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Check Point | share | FortiManager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 20 | 5% | 2 | 2% | Check Point |
| 11-50 employees | 45 | 10% | 9 | 9% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 76 | 17% | 17 | 17% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 60 | 14% | 14 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 31 | 7% | 23 | 22% | FortiManager |
| 1001-5000 employees | 86 | 20% | 18 | 17% | Check Point |
| 5001-10000 employees | 31 | 7% | 9 | 9% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 90 | 20% | 11 | 11% | Check Point |
| Segment | Check Point | share | FortiManager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 178 | 40% | 42 | 41% | even |
| Business & finance services | 100 | 23% | 20 | 19% | Check Point |
| Manufacturing & industry | 40 | 9% | 11 | 11% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 28 | 6% | 11 | 11% | FortiManager |
| Commerce & trade | 18 | 4% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 17 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 13 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 12 | 3% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 11 | 2% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Property & construction | 10 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 6 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Check Point | share | FortiManager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 223 | 51% | 49 | 48% | Check Point |
| United Kingdom | 33 | 7% | 6 | 6% | even |
| France | 29 | 7% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 23 | 5% | 11 | 11% | FortiManager |
| Belgium | 12 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Italy | 12 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | 11 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 9 | 2% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Singapore | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 8 | 2% | 8 | 8% | FortiManager |
| Portugal | 7 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 6 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Check Point | share | FortiManager | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 1,427 | 63% | 253 | 83% | FortiManager |
| Finance & accounting | 170 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 119 | 5% | 3 | 1% | Check Point |
| Software engineering | 108 | 5% | 7 | 2% | Check Point |
| Customer service & success | 73 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Check Point |
| Product, program & project management | 35 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 28 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 10 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 10 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 9 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Check Point →
Companies using FortiManager →
network security zero trust ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
FortiManager is named by 103 companies in job postings and Check Point by 441; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/check-point-vs-fortimanager)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Check Point vs FortiManager: questions
Which is more used, Check Point or FortiManager?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Check Point (441) over FortiManager (103). By website-and-DNS footprint, FortiManager (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Check Point?
32% of Check Point companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for FortiManager. 47% of Check Point companies have over 1,000 employees, against 37% for FortiManager.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Check Point in marketing and FortiManager in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Check Point or FortiManager. Start free, no card.