Checkmarx VS GitHub Advanced Security
As of 30 October 2026, GitHub Advanced Security is named by 105 companies and Checkmarx by 193; Checkmarx skews to companies under 200 people (30% vs 23%), GitHub Advanced Security to companies over 1,000 (47% vs 42%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Checkmarx's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GitHub Advanced Security rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Checkmarx: 2–200 employees
- 30%
- GitHub Advanced Security: 2–200 employees
- 23%
- Checkmarx: 1,000+ employees
- 42%
- GitHub Advanced Security: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 2.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | GitHub Advanced Security | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 5% | 4 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 23 | 12% | 7 | 7% | Checkmarx |
| 51-200 employees | 25 | 13% | 13 | 12% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 34 | 18% | 17 | 16% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 14 | 7% | 15 | 14% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| 1001-5000 employees | 35 | 18% | 23 | 22% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| 5001-10000 employees | 8 | 4% | 6 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 39 | 20% | 20 | 19% | even |
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | GitHub Advanced Security | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 99 | 51% | 44 | 42% | Checkmarx |
| Business & finance services | 56 | 29% | 35 | 33% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Manufacturing & industry | 9 | 5% | 5 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 5 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 3 | 2% | 4 | 4% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 4 | 4% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | GitHub Advanced Security | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 135 | 70% | 73 | 70% | even |
| France | 11 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 6% | 10 | 10% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| India | 8 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Checkmarx |
| Singapore | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 4 | 4% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Romania | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 4 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Germany | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Checkmarx | share | GitHub Advanced Security | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 384 | 54% | 76 | 28% | Checkmarx |
| IT operations & business systems | 234 | 33% | 157 | 57% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Product, program & project management | 11 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 8 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | 12 | 4% | GitHub Advanced Security |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Procurement and purchasing | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Checkmarx →
Companies using GitHub Advanced Security →
application security testing ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GitHub Advanced Security is named by 105 companies in job postings and Checkmarx by 193; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/checkmarx-vs-github-advanced-security)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Checkmarx vs GitHub Advanced Security: questions
Which is more used, Checkmarx or GitHub Advanced Security?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Checkmarx (193) over GitHub Advanced Security (105). By website-and-DNS footprint, GitHub Advanced Security (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Checkmarx?
30% of Checkmarx companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 23% for GitHub Advanced Security. 42% of Checkmarx companies have over 1,000 employees, against 47% for GitHub Advanced Security.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Checkmarx in marketing and GitHub Advanced Security in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Checkmarx or GitHub Advanced Security. Start free, no card.