Checkmk VS Google Cloud Monitoring
As of 30 October 2026, Google Cloud Monitoring is named by 170 companies and Checkmk by 106; Checkmk skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 39%), Google Cloud Monitoring to companies over 1,000 (37% vs 41%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Checkmk's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google Cloud Monitoring rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Checkmk: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- Google Cloud Monitoring: 2–200 employees
- 39%
- Checkmk: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- Google Cloud Monitoring: 1,000+ employees
- 37%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.6 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Checkmk | share | Google Cloud Monitoring | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 7% | 7 | 4% | Checkmk |
| 11-50 employees | 11 | 10% | 25 | 15% | Google Cloud Monitoring |
| 51-200 employees | 20 | 19% | 34 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 19 | 18% | 23 | 14% | Checkmk |
| 501-1000 employees | 6 | 6% | 17 | 10% | Google Cloud Monitoring |
| 1001-5000 employees | 18 | 17% | 21 | 12% | Checkmk |
| 5001-10000 employees | 5 | 5% | 9 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 20 | 19% | 33 | 19% | even |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Checkmk | share | Google Cloud Monitoring | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 37 | 35% | 104 | 61% | Google Cloud Monitoring |
| Business & finance services | 17 | 16% | 26 | 15% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 16 | 15% | 12 | 7% | Checkmk |
| Public, community & associations | 9 | 8% | 2 | 1% | Checkmk |
| Media & content | 6 | 6% | 2 | 1% | Checkmk |
| Property & construction | 5 | 5% | 3 | 2% | Checkmk |
| Health care | 3 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 6 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Checkmk | share | Google Cloud Monitoring | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 44 | 42% | 7 | 4% | Checkmk |
| United States | 20 | 19% | 107 | 63% | Google Cloud Monitoring |
| France | 6 | 6% | 5 | 3% | Checkmk |
| Austria | 5 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 5% | 19 | 11% | Google Cloud Monitoring |
| Netherlands | 5 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 3 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 7 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Checkmk | share | Google Cloud Monitoring | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 138 | 60% | 137 | 25% | Checkmk |
| Software engineering | 46 | 20% | 234 | 42% | Google Cloud Monitoring |
| Engineering (non-software) | 9 | 4% | 5 | 1% | Checkmk |
| Administration & office | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 2 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 72 | 13% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Checkmk →
Companies using Google Cloud Monitoring →
metrics monitoring ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Google Cloud Monitoring is named by 170 companies in job postings and Checkmk by 106; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/checkmk-vs-google-cloud-monitoring)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Checkmk vs Google Cloud Monitoring: questions
Which is more used, Checkmk or Google Cloud Monitoring?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google Cloud Monitoring (170) over Checkmk (106). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google Cloud Monitoring (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Checkmk?
36% of Checkmk companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 39% for Google Cloud Monitoring. 41% of Checkmk companies have over 1,000 employees, against 37% for Google Cloud Monitoring.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Checkmk in marketing and Google Cloud Monitoring in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Checkmk or Google Cloud Monitoring. Start free, no card.