Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · metrics monitoring

Checkmk VS PRTG Network Monitor

As of 30 October 2026, PRTG Network Monitor is named by 244 companies and Checkmk by 106; Checkmk skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 36%), PRTG Network Monitor to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 41%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Checkmk's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, PRTG Network Monitor rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Checkmk: 2–200 employees
36%
PRTG Network Monitor: 2–200 employees
36%
Checkmk: 1,000+ employees
41%
PRTG Network Monitor: 1,000+ employees
33%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.6 · 2.0
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
106companies name Checkmk
244companies name PRTG Network Monitor
15name both
171 · 499postings in 90 days, Checkmk · PRTG Network Monitor
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCheckmksharePRTG Network MonitorshareLeans
2-10 employees77%135%even
11-50 employees1110%2611%even
51-200 employees2019%4920%even
201-500 employees1918%4619%even
501-1000 employees66%2811%PRTG Network Monitor
1001-5000 employees1817%5020%PRTG Network Monitor
5001-10000 employees55%125%even
10,001+ employees2019%198%Checkmk
Self-employed––10%outside top 12
By industry
SegmentCheckmksharePRTG Network MonitorshareLeans
Technology & software3735%9338%PRTG Network Monitor
Business & finance services1716%4016%even
Manufacturing & industry1615%4318%PRTG Network Monitor
Public, community & associations98%52%Checkmk
Media & content66%52%Checkmk
Property & construction55%62%Checkmk
Health care33%156%PRTG Network Monitor
Hospitality & travel33%––outside top 12
Transport, logistics & rental33%52%even
Automotive22%52%even
Commerce & trade22%52%even
Utilities & infrastructure22%167%PRTG Network Monitor
Consumer services & leisure––42%outside top 12
By country
SegmentCheckmksharePRTG Network MonitorshareLeans
Germany4442%3414%Checkmk
United States2019%11748%PRTG Network Monitor
France66%73%Checkmk
Austria55%52%Checkmk
United Kingdom55%198%PRTG Network Monitor
Netherlands55%62%Checkmk
Italy33%52%even
Poland33%42%even
Portugal33%42%even
Canada22%115%PRTG Network Monitor
Denmark22%––outside top 12
Australia11%––outside top 12
India––62%outside top 12
Brazil––52%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCheckmksharePRTG Network MonitorshareLeans
IT operations & business systems13860%50475%PRTG Network Monitor
Software engineering4620%132%Checkmk
Engineering (non-software)94%142%even
Administration & office21%10%even
Sales21%41%even
Customer service & success10%183%PRTG Network Monitor
Marketing & communications10%10%even
Product, program & project management10%61%even
Unclassified10%––outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service––51%outside top 12
Data & AI––20%outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment––10%outside top 12
Facilities cleaning and security––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

PRTG Network Monitor is named by 244 companies in job postings and Checkmk by 106; 15 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/checkmk-vs-prtg-network-monitor)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor: questions

Which is more used, Checkmk or PRTG Network Monitor?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, PRTG Network Monitor (244) over Checkmk (106). By website-and-DNS footprint, PRTG Network Monitor (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Checkmk?

36% of Checkmk companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for PRTG Network Monitor. 41% of Checkmk companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for PRTG Network Monitor.

Do companies run both?

15 companies name both in their postings, usually Checkmk in marketing and PRTG Network Monitor in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Checkmk or PRTG Network Monitor. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market