Cilium VS Docker Swarm
As of 30 October 2026, Docker Swarm is named by 134 companies and Cilium by 114; Cilium skews to companies under 200 people (48% vs 56%), Docker Swarm to companies over 1,000 (22% vs 26%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cilium's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Docker Swarm rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cilium: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- Docker Swarm: 2–200 employees
- 56%
- Cilium: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Docker Swarm: 1,000+ employees
- 22%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cilium | share | Docker Swarm | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 9% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 16 | 14% | 29 | 22% | Docker Swarm |
| 51-200 employees | 29 | 25% | 36 | 27% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 16% | 14 | 10% | Cilium |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 7% | 12 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 20 | 18% | 12 | 9% | Cilium |
| 5001-10000 employees | 4 | 4% | 6 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 6 | 5% | 11 | 8% | Docker Swarm |
| Segment | Cilium | share | Docker Swarm | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 79 | 69% | 91 | 68% | even |
| Business & finance services | 11 | 10% | 10 | 7% | Cilium |
| Manufacturing & industry | 8 | 7% | 13 | 10% | Docker Swarm |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Cilium |
| Media & content | 3 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 2 | 2% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | Docker Swarm |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cilium | share | Docker Swarm | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 73 | 64% | 79 | 59% | Cilium |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 11% | 9 | 7% | Cilium |
| Germany | 5 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| France | 3 | 3% | 10 | 7% | Docker Swarm |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| India | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Norway | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cilium | share | Docker Swarm | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 238 | 58% | 303 | 70% | Docker Swarm |
| IT operations & business systems | 112 | 27% | 59 | 14% | Cilium |
| Sales | 14 | 3% | 6 | 1% | Cilium |
| Data & AI | 11 | 3% | 11 | 3% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | 14 | 3% | Docker Swarm |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cilium →
Companies using Docker Swarm →
container orchestration ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Docker Swarm is named by 134 companies in job postings and Cilium by 114; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cilium-vs-docker-swarm)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cilium vs Docker Swarm: questions
Which is more used, Cilium or Docker Swarm?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Docker Swarm (134) over Cilium (114). By website-and-DNS footprint, Docker Swarm (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cilium?
48% of Cilium companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 56% for Docker Swarm. 26% of Cilium companies have over 1,000 employees, against 22% for Docker Swarm.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Cilium in marketing and Docker Swarm in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cilium or Docker Swarm. Start free, no card.