Classic ASP VS JDBC
As of 30 October 2026, JDBC is named by 436 companies and Classic ASP by 347; Classic ASP skews to companies under 200 people (53% vs 42%), JDBC to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 30%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Classic ASP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, JDBC rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Classic ASP: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- JDBC: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Classic ASP: 1,000+ employees
- 30%
- JDBC: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Classic ASP | share | JDBC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 19 | 5% | 26 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 95 | 27% | 63 | 14% | Classic ASP |
| 51-200 employees | 71 | 20% | 95 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 39 | 11% | 59 | 14% | JDBC |
| 501-1000 employees | 20 | 6% | 44 | 10% | JDBC |
| 1001-5000 employees | 46 | 13% | 67 | 15% | JDBC |
| 5001-10000 employees | 18 | 5% | 21 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 39 | 11% | 59 | 14% | JDBC |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Classic ASP | share | JDBC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 154 | 44% | 274 | 63% | JDBC |
| Business & finance services | 72 | 21% | 79 | 18% | Classic ASP |
| Manufacturing & industry | 43 | 12% | 25 | 6% | Classic ASP |
| Public, community & associations | 14 | 4% | 5 | 1% | Classic ASP |
| Property & construction | 12 | 3% | 6 | 1% | Classic ASP |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 9 | 3% | 12 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 2% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 8 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 7 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Health care | 7 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 5 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Segment | Classic ASP | share | JDBC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 199 | 57% | 298 | 68% | JDBC |
| Canada | 20 | 6% | 11 | 3% | Classic ASP |
| Germany | 20 | 6% | 7 | 2% | Classic ASP |
| India | 20 | 6% | 22 | 5% | even |
| United Kingdom | 16 | 5% | 25 | 6% | even |
| France | 15 | 4% | 6 | 1% | Classic ASP |
| Singapore | 7 | 2% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Classic ASP | share | JDBC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 621 | 49% | 1,751 | 72% | JDBC |
| IT operations & business systems | 185 | 14% | 254 | 10% | Classic ASP |
| Finance & accounting | 35 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 35 | 3% | 10 | 0% | Classic ASP |
| Data & AI | 29 | 2% | 76 | 3% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 26 | 2% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Social care and community | 22 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 19 | 1% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 16 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 15 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 14 | 1% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 14 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 18 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 14 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Classic ASP →
Companies using JDBC →
backend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
JDBC is named by 436 companies in job postings and Classic ASP by 347; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/classic-asp-vs-jdbc)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Classic ASP vs JDBC: questions
Which is more used, Classic ASP or JDBC?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, JDBC (436) over Classic ASP (347). By website-and-DNS footprint, JDBC (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Classic ASP?
53% of Classic ASP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for JDBC. 30% of Classic ASP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for JDBC.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Classic ASP in marketing and JDBC in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Classic ASP or JDBC. Start free, no card.