Claude Cowork VS Glean
As of 30 October 2026, Glean is named by 108 companies and Claude Cowork by 288; Claude Cowork skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 19%), Glean to companies over 1,000 (54% vs 31%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Claude Cowork's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Glean rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Claude Cowork: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Glean: 2–200 employees
- 19%
- Claude Cowork: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Glean: 1,000+ employees
- 54%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 3.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Claude Cowork | share | Glean | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 23 | 8% | 4 | 4% | Claude Cowork |
| 11-50 employees | 36 | 13% | 9 | 8% | Claude Cowork |
| 51-200 employees | 67 | 23% | 8 | 7% | Claude Cowork |
| 201-500 employees | 43 | 15% | 15 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 26 | 9% | 14 | 13% | Glean |
| 1001-5000 employees | 49 | 17% | 36 | 33% | Glean |
| 5001-10000 employees | 17 | 6% | 7 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 24 | 8% | 15 | 14% | Glean |
| Segment | Claude Cowork | share | Glean | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 120 | 42% | 61 | 56% | Glean |
| Business & finance services | 86 | 30% | 18 | 17% | Claude Cowork |
| Manufacturing & industry | 16 | 6% | 6 | 6% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 10 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Claude Cowork |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 10 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 9 | 3% | 6 | 6% | Glean |
| Property & construction | 9 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 2% | 5 | 5% | Glean |
| Health care | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Claude Cowork | share | Glean | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 201 | 70% | 87 | 81% | Glean |
| Germany | 22 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 5% | 6 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 8 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| France | 8 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 4 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| China | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Claude Cowork | share | Glean | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 148 | 18% | 76 | 17% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 77 | 9% | 60 | 14% | Glean |
| IT operations & business systems | 72 | 9% | 31 | 7% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 61 | 7% | 29 | 7% | even |
| Sales | 61 | 7% | 46 | 11% | Glean |
| Software engineering | 59 | 7% | 38 | 9% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 51 | 6% | 13 | 3% | Claude Cowork |
| General management & consulting | 25 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 22 | 3% | 21 | 5% | Glean |
| Business development & strategy | 21 | 3% | 14 | 3% | even |
| Human resources | 12 | 1% | 9 | 2% | even |
| Administration & office | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 9 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Claude Cowork →
Companies using Glean →
ai assistants ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Glean is named by 108 companies in job postings and Claude Cowork by 288; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/claude-cowork-vs-glean)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Claude Cowork vs Glean: questions
Which is more used, Claude Cowork or Glean?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Claude Cowork (288) over Glean (108). By website-and-DNS footprint, Glean (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Claude Cowork?
44% of Claude Cowork companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 19% for Glean. 31% of Claude Cowork companies have over 1,000 employees, against 54% for Glean.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Claude Cowork in marketing and Glean in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Claude Cowork or Glean. Start free, no card.