CLO 3D VS ZBrush
As of 30 October 2026, ZBrush is named by 151 companies and CLO 3D by 104; CLO 3D skews to companies under 200 people (34% vs 53%), ZBrush to companies over 1,000 (23% vs 49%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CLO 3D's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ZBrush rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CLO 3D: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- ZBrush: 2–200 employees
- 53%
- CLO 3D: 1,000+ employees
- 49%
- ZBrush: 1,000+ employees
- 23%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.9 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CLO 3D | share | ZBrush | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 5 | 5% | 16 | 11% | ZBrush |
| 11-50 employees | 10 | 10% | 33 | 22% | ZBrush |
| 51-200 employees | 20 | 19% | 31 | 21% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 13 | 13% | 23 | 15% | ZBrush |
| 501-1000 employees | 3 | 3% | 13 | 9% | ZBrush |
| 1001-5000 employees | 25 | 24% | 20 | 13% | CLO 3D |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 6% | 3 | 2% | CLO 3D |
| 10,001+ employees | 20 | 19% | 11 | 7% | CLO 3D |
| Segment | CLO 3D | share | ZBrush | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 32 | 31% | 22 | 15% | CLO 3D |
| Commerce & trade | 31 | 30% | 6 | 4% | CLO 3D |
| Manufacturing & industry | 22 | 21% | 12 | 8% | CLO 3D |
| Technology & software | 9 | 9% | 8 | 5% | CLO 3D |
| Media & content | 5 | 5% | 84 | 56% | ZBrush |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 2% | 13 | 9% | ZBrush |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CLO 3D | share | ZBrush | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 63 | 61% | 89 | 59% | even |
| Germany | 8 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 6% | 25 | 17% | ZBrush |
| Canada | 4 | 4% | 5 | 3% | even |
| France | 3 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| India | 3 | 3% | 8 | 5% | ZBrush |
| Australia | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Japan | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CLO 3D | share | ZBrush | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design & UX | 105 | 26% | 398 | 69% | ZBrush |
| Finance & accounting | 50 | 13% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 32 | 8% | 17 | 3% | CLO 3D |
| Software engineering | 29 | 7% | 3 | 1% | CLO 3D |
| Business development & strategy | 12 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 10 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 6 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 10 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CLO 3D →
Companies using ZBrush →
3d modeling rendering ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
ZBrush is named by 151 companies in job postings and CLO 3D by 104; 3 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/clo-3d-vs-zbrush)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CLO 3D vs ZBrush: questions
Which is more used, CLO 3D or ZBrush?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, ZBrush (151) over CLO 3D (104). By website-and-DNS footprint, ZBrush (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CLO 3D?
34% of CLO 3D companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 53% for ZBrush. 49% of CLO 3D companies have over 1,000 employees, against 23% for ZBrush.
Do companies run both?
3 companies name both in their postings, usually CLO 3D in marketing and ZBrush in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CLO 3D or ZBrush. Start free, no card.