CODESYS VS Structured Text
As of 30 October 2026, Structured Text is named by 206 companies and CODESYS by 250; CODESYS skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 38%), Structured Text to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 31%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: CODESYS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Structured Text rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- CODESYS: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Structured Text: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- CODESYS: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Structured Text: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | CODESYS | share | Structured Text | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 17 | 7% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 47 | 19% | 31 | 15% | CODESYS |
| 51-200 employees | 58 | 23% | 36 | 17% | CODESYS |
| 201-500 employees | 30 | 12% | 30 | 15% | Structured Text |
| 501-1000 employees | 21 | 8% | 20 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 34 | 14% | 34 | 17% | Structured Text |
| 5001-10000 employees | 13 | 5% | 12 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 30 | 12% | 29 | 14% | Structured Text |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CODESYS | share | Structured Text | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 153 | 61% | 122 | 59% | even |
| Business & finance services | 19 | 8% | 13 | 6% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 15 | 6% | 13 | 6% | even |
| Property & construction | 12 | 5% | 9 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Technology & software | 11 | 4% | 13 | 6% | even |
| Automotive | 9 | 4% | 15 | 7% | Structured Text |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 2% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 6 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CODESYS | share | Structured Text | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 99 | 40% | 21 | 10% | CODESYS |
| United States | 73 | 29% | 119 | 58% | Structured Text |
| Netherlands | 15 | 6% | 7 | 3% | CODESYS |
| France | 11 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 4% | 7 | 3% | even |
| Austria | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 5 | 2% | 10 | 5% | Structured Text |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 1% | 6 | 3% | even |
| Bulgaria | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | CODESYS | share | Structured Text | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 399 | 61% | 338 | 68% | Structured Text |
| Skilled trades and field service | 76 | 12% | 29 | 6% | CODESYS |
| Software engineering | 72 | 11% | 73 | 15% | Structured Text |
| Sales | 9 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 3 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 3 | 0% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 2 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using CODESYS →
Companies using Structured Text →
plc programming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Structured Text is named by 206 companies in job postings and CODESYS by 250; 37 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/codesys-vs-structured-text)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
CODESYS vs Structured Text: questions
Which is more used, CODESYS or Structured Text?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, CODESYS (250) over Structured Text (206). By website-and-DNS footprint, Structured Text (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses CODESYS?
49% of CODESYS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Structured Text. 31% of CODESYS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Structured Text.
Do companies run both?
37 companies name both in their postings, usually CODESYS in marketing and Structured Text in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on CODESYS or Structured Text. Start free, no card.