Copado VS GitHub Actions
As of 30 October 2026, GitHub Actions is named by 4,647 companies and Copado by 198; Copado skews to companies under 200 people (21% vs 48%), GitHub Actions to companies over 1,000 (25% vs 47%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Copado's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GitHub Actions rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Copado: 2–200 employees
- 21%
- GitHub Actions: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- Copado: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- GitHub Actions: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Copado | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 64 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 3% | 390 | 8% | GitHub Actions |
| 11-50 employees | 10 | 5% | 815 | 18% | GitHub Actions |
| 51-200 employees | 26 | 13% | 1,045 | 22% | GitHub Actions |
| 201-500 employees | 35 | 18% | 685 | 15% | Copado |
| 501-1000 employees | 24 | 12% | 470 | 10% | Copado |
| 1001-5000 employees | 46 | 23% | 603 | 13% | Copado |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 8% | 170 | 4% | Copado |
| 10,001+ employees | 33 | 17% | 405 | 9% | Copado |
| Segment | Copado | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 97 | 49% | 2,577 | 55% | GitHub Actions |
| Business & finance services | 45 | 23% | 876 | 19% | Copado |
| Manufacturing & industry | 26 | 13% | 388 | 8% | Copado |
| Health care | 9 | 5% | 61 | 1% | Copado |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 3% | 77 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 94 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 111 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 100 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 167 | 4% | GitHub Actions |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 52 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | 39 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 61 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Copado | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 147 | 74% | 2,805 | 60% | Copado |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 7% | 406 | 9% | even |
| India | 7 | 4% | 139 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 3% | 110 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 5 | 3% | 239 | 5% | GitHub Actions |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | 44 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 2 | 1% | 117 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | 49 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 56 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 66 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 63 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 47 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Copado | share | GitHub Actions | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 490 | 69% | 11,322 | 65% | Copado |
| IT operations & business systems | 101 | 14% | 1,835 | 10% | Copado |
| Product, program & project management | 22 | 3% | 122 | 1% | Copado |
| Sales | 9 | 1% | 67 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 1% | 34 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 5 | 1% | 2,094 | 12% | GitHub Actions |
| Quality, safety & environment | 5 | 1% | 112 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3 | 0% | 310 | 2% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 25 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | – | – | 26 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Copado →
Companies using GitHub Actions →
ci cd ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GitHub Actions is named by 4,647 companies in job postings and Copado by 198; 58 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/copado-vs-github-actions)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Copado vs GitHub Actions: questions
Which is more used, Copado or GitHub Actions?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitHub Actions (4,647) over Copado (198). By website-and-DNS footprint, GitHub Actions (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Copado?
21% of Copado companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 48% for GitHub Actions. 47% of Copado companies have over 1,000 employees, against 25% for GitHub Actions.
Do companies run both?
58 companies name both in their postings, usually Copado in marketing and GitHub Actions in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Copado or GitHub Actions. Start free, no card.