Copado VS Octopus Deploy
As of 30 October 2026, Octopus Deploy is named by 141 companies and Copado by 198; Copado skews to companies under 200 people (21% vs 29%), Octopus Deploy to companies over 1,000 (40% vs 47%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Copado's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Octopus Deploy rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Copado: 2–200 employees
- 21%
- Octopus Deploy: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- Copado: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- Octopus Deploy: 1,000+ employees
- 40%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.8 · 2.4
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Copado | share | Octopus Deploy | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 6 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 10 | 5% | 18 | 13% | Octopus Deploy |
| 51-200 employees | 26 | 13% | 19 | 13% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 35 | 18% | 27 | 19% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 24 | 12% | 16 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 46 | 23% | 29 | 21% | Copado |
| 5001-10000 employees | 15 | 8% | 8 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 33 | 17% | 19 | 13% | Copado |
| Segment | Copado | share | Octopus Deploy | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 97 | 49% | 66 | 47% | Copado |
| Business & finance services | 45 | 23% | 36 | 26% | Octopus Deploy |
| Manufacturing & industry | 26 | 13% | 13 | 9% | Copado |
| Health care | 9 | 5% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Octopus Deploy |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Copado | share | Octopus Deploy | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 147 | 74% | 81 | 57% | Copado |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 7% | 13 | 9% | Octopus Deploy |
| India | 7 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Copado |
| Canada | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 5 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| France | 2 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Octopus Deploy |
| Poland | 2 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 6 | 4% | Octopus Deploy |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Copado | share | Octopus Deploy | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 490 | 69% | 314 | 64% | Copado |
| IT operations & business systems | 101 | 14% | 48 | 10% | Copado |
| Product, program & project management | 22 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 9 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 5 | 1% | 28 | 6% | Octopus Deploy |
| Quality, safety & environment | 5 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3 | 0% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Copado →
Companies using Octopus Deploy →
ci cd ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Octopus Deploy is named by 141 companies in job postings and Copado by 198; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/copado-vs-octopus-deploy)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Copado vs Octopus Deploy: questions
Which is more used, Copado or Octopus Deploy?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Copado (198) over Octopus Deploy (141). By website-and-DNS footprint, Octopus Deploy (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Copado?
21% of Copado companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 29% for Octopus Deploy. 47% of Copado companies have over 1,000 employees, against 40% for Octopus Deploy.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Copado in marketing and Octopus Deploy in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Copado or Octopus Deploy. Start free, no card.