Cortex XSOAR VS Google SecOps
As of 4 November 2026, Google SecOps is named by 120 companies and Cortex XSOAR by 119; Cortex XSOAR skews to companies under 200 people (27% vs 29%), Google SecOps to companies over 1,000 (48% vs 47%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cortex XSOAR's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Google SecOps rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Cortex XSOAR: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Google SecOps: 2–200 employees
- 29%
- Cortex XSOAR: 1,000+ employees
- 47%
- Google SecOps: 1,000+ employees
- 48%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.2 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Cortex XSOAR | share | Google SecOps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 2% | 5 | 4% | Google SecOps |
| 11-50 employees | 12 | 10% | 14 | 12% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 18 | 15% | 16 | 13% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 13 | 11% | 13 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 13% | 14 | 12% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 23 | 19% | 25 | 21% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 6% | 8 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 26 | 22% | 24 | 20% | even |
| Segment | Cortex XSOAR | share | Google SecOps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 63 | 53% | 47 | 39% | Cortex XSOAR |
| Business & finance services | 22 | 18% | 34 | 28% | Google SecOps |
| Manufacturing & industry | 8 | 7% | 10 | 8% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 6 | 5% | 1 | 1% | Cortex XSOAR |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 5 | 4% | 7 | 6% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 3% | 8 | 7% | Google SecOps |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 1 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cortex XSOAR | share | Google SecOps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 81 | 68% | 69 | 57% | Cortex XSOAR |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 7% | 13 | 11% | Google SecOps |
| France | 4 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 3 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 3 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| India | 3 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Spain | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Google SecOps |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Mexico | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Cortex XSOAR | share | Google SecOps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 245 | 56% | 377 | 77% | Google SecOps |
| Software engineering | 39 | 9% | 17 | 3% | Cortex XSOAR |
| Product, program & project management | 13 | 3% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Sales | 13 | 3% | 22 | 4% | even |
| Data & AI | 11 | 3% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 5 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 4 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Cortex XSOAR →
Companies using Google SecOps →
siem soar threat intel ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Google SecOps is named by 120 companies in job postings and Cortex XSOAR by 119; 20 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cortex-xsoar-vs-google-secops)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Cortex XSOAR vs Google SecOps: questions
Which is more used, Cortex XSOAR or Google SecOps?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Google SecOps (120) over Cortex XSOAR (119). By website-and-DNS footprint, Google SecOps (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Cortex XSOAR?
27% of Cortex XSOAR companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 29% for Google SecOps. 47% of Cortex XSOAR companies have over 1,000 employees, against 48% for Google SecOps.
Do companies run both?
20 companies name both in their postings, usually Cortex XSOAR in marketing and Google SecOps in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Cortex XSOAR or Google SecOps. Start free, no card.