Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · BI & reporting

Cube VS Sigma Computing

As of 30 October 2026, Sigma Computing is named by 439 companies and Cube by 198; Cube skews to companies under 200 people (38% vs 42%), Sigma Computing to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 31%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Cube's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Sigma Computing rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Cube: 2–200 employees
38%
Sigma Computing: 2–200 employees
42%
Cube: 1,000+ employees
31%
Sigma Computing: 1,000+ employees
27%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.0 · 2.7
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
198companies name Cube
439companies name Sigma Computing
6name both
399 · 1,173postings in 90 days, Cube · Sigma Computing
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentCubeshareSigma ComputingshareLeans
Self-employed32%41%even
2-10 employees84%266%even
11-50 employees2412%5312%even
51-200 employees4422%10524%even
201-500 employees4020%7918%Cube
501-1000 employees179%5212%Sigma Computing
1001-5000 employees3216%6214%Cube
5001-10000 employees84%225%even
10,001+ employees2211%368%Cube
By industry
SegmentCubeshareSigma ComputingshareLeans
Technology & software7839%17740%even
Business & finance services5025%10323%even
Manufacturing & industry1910%4510%even
Property & construction116%286%even
Media & content105%123%Cube
Commerce & trade63%184%even
Health care63%133%even
Public, community & associations53%51%even
Transport, logistics & rental53%––outside top 12
Consumer services & leisure32%102%even
Automotive21%92%even
Utilities & infrastructure21%102%even
Hospitality & travel––41%outside top 12
By country
SegmentCubeshareSigma ComputingshareLeans
United States13970%32273%Sigma Computing
United Kingdom137%276%even
Germany63%286%Sigma Computing
Canada53%102%even
India42%92%even
Netherlands42%41%even
France32%102%even
Italy32%––outside top 12
Brazil21%––outside top 12
Denmark21%31%even
Spain21%41%even
Japan21%––outside top 12
Australia––31%outside top 12
Switzerland––31%outside top 12
Sweden––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentCubeshareSigma ComputingshareLeans
Data & AI13624%39626%Sigma Computing
IT operations & business systems11721%15810%Cube
Engineering (non-software)417%725%Cube
Software engineering356%362%Cube
Finance & accounting285%1389%Sigma Computing
Construction and civil142%––outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment132%383%even
Product, program & project management122%725%Sigma Computing
Sales92%534%even
Legal, compliance & risk51%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport41%––outside top 12
Arts media and entertainment20%––outside top 12
Healthcare clinical––846%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––644%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––272%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––232%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Sigma Computing is named by 439 companies in job postings and Cube by 198; 6 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/cube-vs-sigma-computing)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Cube vs Sigma Computing: questions

Which is more used, Cube or Sigma Computing?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Sigma Computing (439) over Cube (198). By website-and-DNS footprint, Sigma Computing (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Cube?

38% of Cube companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 42% for Sigma Computing. 31% of Cube companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Sigma Computing.

Do companies run both?

6 companies name both in their postings, usually Cube in marketing and Sigma Computing in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Cube or Sigma Computing. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market