Databricks VS Microsoft Fabric
As of 4 November 2026, Microsoft Fabric is named by 2,716 companies and Databricks by 5,188; Databricks skews to companies under 200 people (34% vs 27%), Microsoft Fabric to companies over 1,000 (43% vs 39%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Databricks's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Fabric rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Databricks: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- Microsoft Fabric: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- Databricks: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- Microsoft Fabric: 1,000+ employees
- 43%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 5.3 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Databricks | share | Microsoft Fabric | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 105 | 2% | 41 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 309 | 6% | 121 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 524 | 10% | 217 | 8% | Databricks |
| 51-200 employees | 926 | 18% | 402 | 15% | Databricks |
| 201-500 employees | 723 | 14% | 408 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 568 | 11% | 355 | 13% | Microsoft Fabric |
| 1001-5000 employees | 921 | 18% | 587 | 22% | Microsoft Fabric |
| 5001-10000 employees | 325 | 6% | 174 | 6% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 787 | 15% | 411 | 15% | even |
| Segment | Databricks | share | Microsoft Fabric | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 2,090 | 40% | 810 | 30% | Databricks |
| Business & finance services | 1,242 | 24% | 622 | 23% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 524 | 10% | 383 | 14% | Microsoft Fabric |
| Commerce & trade | 215 | 4% | 144 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 195 | 4% | 119 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 182 | 4% | 66 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 141 | 3% | 91 | 3% | even |
| Health care | 136 | 3% | 90 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 114 | 2% | 89 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 105 | 2% | 124 | 5% | Microsoft Fabric |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 89 | 2% | 73 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | 76 | 1% | 57 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Databricks | share | Microsoft Fabric | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 2,976 | 57% | 1,367 | 50% | Databricks |
| United Kingdom | 385 | 7% | 227 | 8% | even |
| Germany | 236 | 5% | 170 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 145 | 3% | 124 | 5% | even |
| France | 119 | 2% | 80 | 3% | even |
| Netherlands | 116 | 2% | 68 | 3% | even |
| Brazil | 107 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 106 | 2% | 53 | 2% | even |
| India | 105 | 2% | 39 | 1% | even |
| Sweden | 66 | 1% | 47 | 2% | even |
| Switzerland | 53 | 1% | 37 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 51 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 38 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | – | – | 37 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Databricks | share | Microsoft Fabric | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 18,735 | 56% | 4,710 | 54% | even |
| Software engineering | 4,307 | 13% | 882 | 10% | Databricks |
| IT operations & business systems | 2,067 | 6% | 929 | 11% | Microsoft Fabric |
| Sales | 1,179 | 4% | 224 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 997 | 3% | 182 | 2% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 554 | 2% | 108 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 330 | 1% | 117 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 253 | 1% | 23 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 210 | 1% | 30 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 196 | 1% | 118 | 1% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 189 | 1% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 187 | 1% | 22 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 126 | 0% | 25 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 97 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 66 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 66 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | 28 | 0% | 12 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 24 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 20 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 19 | 0% | 18 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 17 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Administration & office | 16 | 0% | 6 | 0% | even |
| Arts media and entertainment | 10 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 8 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | 7 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Travel, leisure & events | 5 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | 4 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public safety and protective services | 4 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Manufacturing and production | 3 | 0% | 15 | 0% | even |
| Real estate and property | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Retail & store operations | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Databricks →
Companies using Microsoft Fabric →
lakehouse table formats ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Fabric is named by 2,716 companies in job postings and Databricks by 5,188; 1,487 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/databricks-vs-microsoft-fabric)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Databricks vs Microsoft Fabric: questions
Which is more used, Databricks or Microsoft Fabric?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Databricks (5,188) over Microsoft Fabric (2,716). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Fabric (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Databricks?
34% of Databricks companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Microsoft Fabric. 39% of Databricks companies have over 1,000 employees, against 43% for Microsoft Fabric.
Do companies run both?
1,487 companies name both in their postings, usually Databricks in marketing and Microsoft Fabric in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Databricks or Microsoft Fabric. Start free, no card.