Dedalus ORBIS VS eClinicalWorks
As of 30 October 2026, eClinicalWorks is named by 383 companies and Dedalus ORBIS by 115; Dedalus ORBIS skews to companies under 200 people (24% vs 48%), eClinicalWorks to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 58%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Dedalus ORBIS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, eClinicalWorks rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Dedalus ORBIS: 2–200 employees
- 24%
- eClinicalWorks: 2–200 employees
- 48%
- Dedalus ORBIS: 1,000+ employees
- 58%
- eClinicalWorks: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 4.4 · 4.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Dedalus ORBIS | share | eClinicalWorks | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 14 | 12% | 40 | 10% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 11 | 10% | 53 | 14% | eClinicalWorks |
| 51-200 employees | 3 | 3% | 92 | 24% | eClinicalWorks |
| 201-500 employees | 6 | 5% | 94 | 25% | eClinicalWorks |
| 501-1000 employees | 14 | 12% | 39 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 43 | 37% | 42 | 11% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 10% | 6 | 2% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| 10,001+ employees | 13 | 11% | 15 | 4% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Dedalus ORBIS | share | eClinicalWorks | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health care | 82 | 71% | 239 | 62% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| Business & finance services | 10 | 9% | 43 | 11% | eClinicalWorks |
| Public, community & associations | 8 | 7% | 34 | 9% | even |
| Technology & software | 5 | 4% | 58 | 15% | eClinicalWorks |
| Manufacturing & industry | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| Media & content | 3 | 3% | 8 | 2% | even |
| Segment | Dedalus ORBIS | share | eClinicalWorks | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | 88 | 77% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United States | 10 | 9% | 371 | 97% | eClinicalWorks |
| France | 5 | 4% | 1 | 0% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 4% | 2 | 1% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| CL | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Dedalus ORBIS | share | eClinicalWorks | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare clinical | 137 | 24% | 815 | 36% | eClinicalWorks |
| IT operations & business systems | 131 | 23% | 25 | 1% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | 65 | 12% | 516 | 23% | eClinicalWorks |
| Finance & accounting | 41 | 7% | 120 | 5% | Dedalus ORBIS |
| Administration & office | 37 | 7% | 427 | 19% | eClinicalWorks |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 19 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 10 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Social care and community | 8 | 1% | 32 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | 22 | 1% | even |
| Software engineering | 6 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 24 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Dedalus ORBIS →
Companies using eClinicalWorks →
ehr practice management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
eClinicalWorks is named by 383 companies in job postings and Dedalus ORBIS by 115; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/dedalus-orbis-vs-eclinicalworks)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Dedalus ORBIS vs eClinicalWorks: questions
Which is more used, Dedalus ORBIS or eClinicalWorks?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, eClinicalWorks (383) over Dedalus ORBIS (115). By website-and-DNS footprint, eClinicalWorks (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Dedalus ORBIS?
24% of Dedalus ORBIS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 48% for eClinicalWorks. 58% of Dedalus ORBIS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for eClinicalWorks.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Dedalus ORBIS in marketing and eClinicalWorks in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Dedalus ORBIS or eClinicalWorks. Start free, no card.