DeepSpeed VS Hugging Face PEFT
As of 30 October 2026, Hugging Face PEFT is named by 155 companies and DeepSpeed by 151; DeepSpeed skews to companies under 200 people (57% vs 46%), Hugging Face PEFT to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 20%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: DeepSpeed's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Hugging Face PEFT rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- DeepSpeed: 2–200 employees
- 57%
- Hugging Face PEFT: 2–200 employees
- 46%
- DeepSpeed: 1,000+ employees
- 20%
- Hugging Face PEFT: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.8 · 2.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | DeepSpeed | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 7 | 5% | 1 | 1% | DeepSpeed |
| 2-10 employees | 36 | 24% | 15 | 10% | DeepSpeed |
| 11-50 employees | 24 | 16% | 24 | 15% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 26 | 17% | 32 | 21% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 201-500 employees | 20 | 13% | 16 | 10% | DeepSpeed |
| 501-1000 employees | 8 | 5% | 11 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 16 | 11% | 29 | 19% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 4% | 11 | 7% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| 10,001+ employees | 8 | 5% | 16 | 10% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Segment | DeepSpeed | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 88 | 58% | 104 | 67% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Public, community & associations | 17 | 11% | 5 | 3% | DeepSpeed |
| Business & finance services | 13 | 9% | 24 | 15% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Manufacturing & industry | 13 | 9% | 6 | 4% | DeepSpeed |
| Media & content | 7 | 5% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 5 | 3% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Segment | DeepSpeed | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 111 | 74% | 105 | 68% | DeepSpeed |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 6% | 12 | 8% | even |
| India | 9 | 6% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | DeepSpeed |
| Singapore | 4 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| TH | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Spain | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Greece | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| South Korea | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Cyprus | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | DeepSpeed | share | Hugging Face PEFT | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 305 | 74% | 464 | 85% | Hugging Face PEFT |
| Software engineering | 31 | 8% | 38 | 7% | even |
| Research and science | 7 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 6 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 4 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 2 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 1 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Human resources | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using DeepSpeed →
Companies using Hugging Face PEFT →
ml frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Hugging Face PEFT is named by 155 companies in job postings and DeepSpeed by 151; 25 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/deepspeed-vs-hugging-face-peft)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
DeepSpeed vs Hugging Face PEFT: questions
Which is more used, DeepSpeed or Hugging Face PEFT?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Hugging Face PEFT (155) over DeepSpeed (151). By website-and-DNS footprint, Hugging Face PEFT (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses DeepSpeed?
57% of DeepSpeed companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 46% for Hugging Face PEFT. 20% of DeepSpeed companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Hugging Face PEFT.
Do companies run both?
25 companies name both in their postings, usually DeepSpeed in marketing and Hugging Face PEFT in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on DeepSpeed or Hugging Face PEFT. Start free, no card.