DIgSILENT PowerFactory VS Femap
As of 30 October 2026, Femap is named by 132 companies and DIgSILENT PowerFactory by 214; DIgSILENT PowerFactory skews to companies under 200 people (31% vs 44%), Femap to companies over 1,000 (28% vs 44%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: DIgSILENT PowerFactory's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Femap rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- DIgSILENT PowerFactory: 2–200 employees
- 31%
- Femap: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- DIgSILENT PowerFactory: 1,000+ employees
- 44%
- Femap: 1,000+ employees
- 28%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.7 · 4.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | DIgSILENT PowerFactory | share | Femap | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 13 | 6% | 13 | 10% | Femap |
| 11-50 employees | 22 | 10% | 20 | 15% | Femap |
| 51-200 employees | 31 | 14% | 25 | 19% | Femap |
| 201-500 employees | 34 | 16% | 24 | 18% | Femap |
| 501-1000 employees | 19 | 9% | 12 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 40 | 19% | 18 | 14% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| 5001-10000 employees | 12 | 6% | 6 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 43 | 20% | 13 | 10% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| Self-employed | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | DIgSILENT PowerFactory | share | Femap | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 58 | 27% | 28 | 21% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 56 | 26% | 6 | 5% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| Property & construction | 41 | 19% | 1 | 1% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| Manufacturing & industry | 26 | 12% | 72 | 55% | Femap |
| Technology & software | 10 | 5% | 10 | 8% | Femap |
| Consumer services & leisure | 7 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 6 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 5 | 2% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 8 | 6% | Femap |
| Segment | DIgSILENT PowerFactory | share | Femap | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 65 | 30% | 97 | 73% | Femap |
| Germany | 38 | 18% | 3 | 2% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| United Kingdom | 30 | 14% | 3 | 2% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| Australia | 15 | 7% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 14 | 7% | 8 | 6% | even |
| Spain | 9 | 4% | 1 | 1% | DIgSILENT PowerFactory |
| Canada | 5 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 5 | 2% | 7 | 5% | Femap |
| Switzerland | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 3 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Norway | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | DIgSILENT PowerFactory | share | Femap | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 532 | 72% | 602 | 90% | Femap |
| Sales | 16 | 2% | 3 | 0% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 14 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Software engineering | 4 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 2 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using DIgSILENT PowerFactory →
Companies using Femap →
cae simulation ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Femap is named by 132 companies in job postings and DIgSILENT PowerFactory by 214; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/digsilent-powerfactory-vs-femap)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
DIgSILENT PowerFactory vs Femap: questions
Which is more used, DIgSILENT PowerFactory or Femap?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, DIgSILENT PowerFactory (214) over Femap (132). By website-and-DNS footprint, Femap (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses DIgSILENT PowerFactory?
31% of DIgSILENT PowerFactory companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 44% for Femap. 44% of DIgSILENT PowerFactory companies have over 1,000 employees, against 28% for Femap.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually DIgSILENT PowerFactory in marketing and Femap in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on DIgSILENT PowerFactory or Femap. Start free, no card.