Django VS Enterprise JavaBeans
As of 30 October 2026, Enterprise JavaBeans is named by 170 companies and Django by 2,060; Django skews to companies under 200 people (66% vs 62%), Enterprise JavaBeans to companies over 1,000 (18% vs 16%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Django's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Enterprise JavaBeans rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Django: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Enterprise JavaBeans: 2–200 employees
- 62%
- Django: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Enterprise JavaBeans: 1,000+ employees
- 18%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 1.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Django | share | Enterprise JavaBeans | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 36 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 262 | 13% | 13 | 8% | Django |
| 11-50 employees | 639 | 31% | 41 | 24% | Django |
| 51-200 employees | 453 | 22% | 51 | 30% | Enterprise JavaBeans |
| 201-500 employees | 223 | 11% | 18 | 11% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 115 | 6% | 13 | 8% | Enterprise JavaBeans |
| 1001-5000 employees | 154 | 7% | 15 | 9% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 50 | 2% | 4 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 128 | 6% | 12 | 7% | even |
| Segment | Django | share | Enterprise JavaBeans | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,281 | 62% | 131 | 77% | Enterprise JavaBeans |
| Business & finance services | 328 | 16% | 24 | 14% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 122 | 6% | 3 | 2% | Django |
| Consumer services & leisure | 80 | 4% | 3 | 2% | Django |
| Media & content | 62 | 3% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 49 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 38 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 30 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 23 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 15 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 11 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Django | share | Enterprise JavaBeans | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,198 | 58% | 102 | 60% | even |
| India | 175 | 8% | 5 | 3% | Django |
| United Kingdom | 128 | 6% | 4 | 2% | Django |
| Germany | 90 | 4% | 10 | 6% | even |
| France | 61 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 37 | 2% | 6 | 4% | even |
| Netherlands | 36 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 29 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 26 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 24 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 20 | 1% | 5 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | 18 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Portugal | – | – | 3 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Django | share | Enterprise JavaBeans | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 4,838 | 75% | 904 | 82% | Enterprise JavaBeans |
| Data & AI | 628 | 10% | 9 | 1% | Django |
| IT operations & business systems | 194 | 3% | 72 | 6% | Enterprise JavaBeans |
| Engineering (non-software) | 78 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 37 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 37 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 24 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 18 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 17 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public safety and protective services | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 11 | 0% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Django →
Companies using Enterprise JavaBeans →
backend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Enterprise JavaBeans is named by 170 companies in job postings and Django by 2,060; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/django-vs-ejb)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Django vs Enterprise JavaBeans: questions
Which is more used, Django or Enterprise JavaBeans?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Django (2,060) over Enterprise JavaBeans (170). By website-and-DNS footprint, Enterprise JavaBeans (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Django?
66% of Django companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 62% for Enterprise JavaBeans. 16% of Django companies have over 1,000 employees, against 18% for Enterprise JavaBeans.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Django in marketing and Enterprise JavaBeans in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Django or Enterprise JavaBeans. Start free, no card.