Django VS Spring Batch
As of 30 October 2026, Spring Batch is named by 125 companies and Django by 2,060; Django skews to companies under 200 people (66% vs 38%), Spring Batch to companies over 1,000 (41% vs 16%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Django's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Spring Batch rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Django: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Spring Batch: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- Django: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Spring Batch: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Django | share | Spring Batch | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 36 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 262 | 13% | 5 | 4% | Django |
| 11-50 employees | 639 | 31% | 21 | 17% | Django |
| 51-200 employees | 453 | 22% | 21 | 17% | Django |
| 201-500 employees | 223 | 11% | 15 | 12% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 115 | 6% | 11 | 9% | Spring Batch |
| 1001-5000 employees | 154 | 7% | 25 | 20% | Spring Batch |
| 5001-10000 employees | 50 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 128 | 6% | 24 | 19% | Spring Batch |
| Segment | Django | share | Spring Batch | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 1,281 | 62% | 69 | 55% | Django |
| Business & finance services | 328 | 16% | 38 | 30% | Spring Batch |
| Manufacturing & industry | 122 | 6% | 1 | 1% | Django |
| Consumer services & leisure | 80 | 4% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Media & content | 62 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 49 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 38 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 30 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 23 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 15 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | 11 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 10 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Django | share | Spring Batch | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 1,198 | 58% | 67 | 54% | Django |
| India | 175 | 8% | 6 | 5% | Django |
| United Kingdom | 128 | 6% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 90 | 4% | 2 | 2% | Django |
| France | 61 | 3% | 23 | 18% | Spring Batch |
| Canada | 37 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 36 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 29 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 26 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 24 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Singapore | 20 | 1% | 4 | 3% | Spring Batch |
| Switzerland | 18 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 5 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Django | share | Spring Batch | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 4,838 | 75% | 653 | 88% | Spring Batch |
| Data & AI | 628 | 10% | 13 | 2% | Django |
| IT operations & business systems | 194 | 3% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 78 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 37 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 37 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 24 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | 18 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 17 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 13 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public safety and protective services | 12 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 11 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Django →
Companies using Spring Batch →
backend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Spring Batch is named by 125 companies in job postings and Django by 2,060; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/django-vs-spring-batch)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Django vs Spring Batch: questions
Which is more used, Django or Spring Batch?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Django (2,060) over Spring Batch (125). By website-and-DNS footprint, Spring Batch (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Django?
66% of Django companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Spring Batch. 16% of Django companies have over 1,000 employees, against 41% for Spring Batch.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Django in marketing and Spring Batch in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Django or Spring Batch. Start free, no card.