Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

DNS VS Spanning Tree Protocol

As of 30 October 2026, Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies and DNS by 2,907; DNS skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 35%), Spanning Tree Protocol to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 32%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: DNS's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Spanning Tree Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

DNS: 2–200 employees
42%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
DNS: 1,000+ employees
32%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.3 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
2,907companies name DNS
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
0name both
6,704 · 747postings in 90 days, DNS · Spanning Tree Protocol
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentDNSshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Self-employed251%31%even
2-10 employees1646%125%even
11-50 employees46416%2511%DNS
51-200 employees58720%4519%even
201-500 employees44515%3113%DNS
501-1000 employees30210%167%DNS
1001-5000 employees51018%4118%even
5001-10000 employees1375%2310%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees2739%3816%Spanning Tree Protocol
By industry
SegmentDNSshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Technology & software1,29044%10344%even
Business & finance services50117%3515%DNS
Manufacturing & industry32811%3013%even
Utilities & infrastructure1124%156%Spanning Tree Protocol
Commerce & trade1044%42%even
Public, community & associations1013%42%even
Health care973%52%even
Consumer services & leisure933%94%even
Property & construction793%73%even
Media & content712%104%even
Automotive532%52%even
Transport, logistics & rental512%52%even
By country
SegmentDNSshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
United States1,54453%14763%Spanning Tree Protocol
Germany31911%156%DNS
United Kingdom1646%83%DNS
France1254%136%even
Canada893%63%even
India622%94%even
Italy482%73%even
Brazil472%52%even
Netherlands431%21%even
Australia401%––outside top 12
Poland381%––outside top 12
Switzerland341%31%even
Japan––31%outside top 12
Sweden––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentDNSshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
IT operations & business systems5,79462%60959%DNS
Software engineering1,20213%959%DNS
Engineering (non-software)4655%222%DNS
Customer service & success2833%323%even
Sales1572%374%even
Product, program & project management751%61%even
Skilled trades and field service531%––outside top 12
Unclassified511%––outside top 12
Data & AI430%––outside top 12
Design & UX210%20%even
Marketing & communications190%––outside top 12
General management & consulting180%61%even
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Finance & accounting––10%outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies in job postings and DNS by 2,907; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/dns-vs-spanning-tree-protocol)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

DNS vs Spanning Tree Protocol: questions

Which is more used, DNS or Spanning Tree Protocol?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, DNS (2,907) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Spanning Tree Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses DNS?

42% of DNS companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Spanning Tree Protocol. 32% of DNS companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Spanning Tree Protocol.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually DNS in marketing and Spanning Tree Protocol in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on DNS or Spanning Tree Protocol. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market