e-Builder VS HCSS HeavyJob
As of 30 October 2026, HCSS HeavyJob is named by 110 companies and e-Builder by 128; e-Builder skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 36%), HCSS HeavyJob to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 41%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: e-Builder's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, HCSS HeavyJob rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- e-Builder: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- HCSS HeavyJob: 2–200 employees
- 36%
- e-Builder: 1,000+ employees
- 41%
- HCSS HeavyJob: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.1 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | e-Builder | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 7 | 5% | 3 | 3% | e-Builder |
| 11-50 employees | 14 | 11% | 6 | 5% | e-Builder |
| 51-200 employees | 25 | 20% | 31 | 28% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 14% | 30 | 27% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 9% | 22 | 20% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| 1001-5000 employees | 22 | 17% | 11 | 10% | e-Builder |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 9% | 4 | 4% | e-Builder |
| 10,001+ employees | 20 | 16% | 3 | 3% | e-Builder |
| Segment | e-Builder | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 57 | 45% | 8 | 7% | e-Builder |
| Property & construction | 34 | 27% | 91 | 83% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Health care | 12 | 9% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 6 | 5% | 2 | 2% | e-Builder |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 4% | 1 | 1% | e-Builder |
| Manufacturing & industry | 4 | 3% | 4 | 4% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Technology & software | 2 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | e-Builder | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 116 | 91% | 96 | 87% | e-Builder |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 2% | 9 | 8% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| BA | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| PR | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | e-Builder | share | HCSS HeavyJob | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Construction and civil | 203 | 35% | 229 | 56% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Product, program & project management | 131 | 23% | 53 | 13% | e-Builder |
| Engineering (non-software) | 55 | 9% | 79 | 19% | HCSS HeavyJob |
| Finance & accounting | 30 | 5% | 10 | 2% | e-Builder |
| Administration & office | 28 | 5% | 2 | 0% | e-Builder |
| Quality, safety & environment | 15 | 3% | 3 | 1% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 13 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 13 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 7 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Procurement and purchasing | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 3 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Facilities cleaning and security | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using e-Builder →
Companies using HCSS HeavyJob →
construction management ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
HCSS HeavyJob is named by 110 companies in job postings and e-Builder by 128; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/e-builder-vs-hcss-heavyjob)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
e-Builder vs HCSS HeavyJob: questions
Which is more used, e-Builder or HCSS HeavyJob?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, e-Builder (128) over HCSS HeavyJob (110). By website-and-DNS footprint, HCSS HeavyJob (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses e-Builder?
36% of e-Builder companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 36% for HCSS HeavyJob. 41% of e-Builder companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for HCSS HeavyJob.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually e-Builder in marketing and HCSS HeavyJob in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on e-Builder or HCSS HeavyJob. Start free, no card.