Eclipse IDE VS GDB
As of 30 October 2026, GDB is named by 206 companies and Eclipse IDE by 898; Eclipse IDE skews to companies under 200 people (45% vs 41%), GDB to companies over 1,000 (34% vs 33%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Eclipse IDE's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GDB rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Eclipse IDE: 2–200 employees
- 45%
- GDB: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Eclipse IDE: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- GDB: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.9 · 3.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Eclipse IDE | share | GDB | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 8 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 37 | 4% | 9 | 4% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 170 | 19% | 31 | 15% | Eclipse IDE |
| 51-200 employees | 200 | 22% | 45 | 22% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 118 | 13% | 27 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 71 | 8% | 20 | 10% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 124 | 14% | 28 | 14% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 45 | 5% | 8 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 125 | 14% | 35 | 17% | GDB |
| Segment | Eclipse IDE | share | GDB | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 421 | 47% | 80 | 39% | Eclipse IDE |
| Business & finance services | 154 | 17% | 22 | 11% | Eclipse IDE |
| Manufacturing & industry | 108 | 12% | 75 | 36% | GDB |
| Health care | 72 | 8% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 28 | 3% | 11 | 5% | GDB |
| Commerce & trade | 27 | 3% | 2 | 1% | Eclipse IDE |
| Consumer services & leisure | 22 | 2% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 16 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 15 | 2% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Automotive | 11 | 1% | 5 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 11 | 1% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 9 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Segment | Eclipse IDE | share | GDB | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 519 | 58% | 145 | 70% | GDB |
| Germany | 97 | 11% | 7 | 3% | Eclipse IDE |
| France | 46 | 5% | 8 | 4% | even |
| India | 45 | 5% | 5 | 2% | Eclipse IDE |
| United Kingdom | 43 | 5% | 15 | 7% | GDB |
| Canada | 24 | 3% | 4 | 2% | even |
| Italy | 14 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 10 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 9 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Poland | 9 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Spain | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | – | – | 4 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Eclipse IDE | share | GDB | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 3,880 | 65% | 553 | 64% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 434 | 7% | 100 | 12% | GDB |
| Healthcare clinical | 211 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | 154 | 3% | 110 | 13% | GDB |
| Sales | 152 | 3% | 1 | 0% | Eclipse IDE |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 135 | 2% | 1 | 0% | Eclipse IDE |
| Data & AI | 79 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 57 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| General management & consulting | 39 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 34 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 33 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 30 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Eclipse IDE →
Companies using GDB →
ides editors debuggers ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GDB is named by 206 companies in job postings and Eclipse IDE by 898; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/eclipse-ide-vs-gdb)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Eclipse IDE vs GDB: questions
Which is more used, Eclipse IDE or GDB?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Eclipse IDE (898) over GDB (206). By website-and-DNS footprint, GDB (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Eclipse IDE?
45% of Eclipse IDE companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for GDB. 33% of Eclipse IDE companies have over 1,000 employees, against 34% for GDB.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Eclipse IDE in marketing and GDB in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Eclipse IDE or GDB. Start free, no card.