Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · api specs data formats

UN/EDIFACT VS ISO 20022

As of 30 October 2026, ISO 20022 is named by 202 companies and UN/EDIFACT by 182; UN/EDIFACT skews to companies under 200 people (28% vs 22%), ISO 20022 to companies over 1,000 (57% vs 47%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: UN/EDIFACT's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, ISO 20022 rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

UN/EDIFACT: 2–200 employees
28%
ISO 20022: 2–200 employees
22%
UN/EDIFACT: 1,000+ employees
47%
ISO 20022: 1,000+ employees
57%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.9 · 3.3
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
182companies name UN/EDIFACT
202companies name ISO 20022
0name both
342 · 668postings in 90 days, UN/EDIFACT · ISO 20022
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareISO 20022shareLeans
Self-employed42%21%even
2-10 employees95%115%even
11-50 employees1810%136%UN/EDIFACT
51-200 employees2413%2110%UN/EDIFACT
201-500 employees2413%2512%even
501-1000 employees1810%157%UN/EDIFACT
1001-5000 employees3821%4824%ISO 20022
5001-10000 employees137%199%ISO 20022
10,001+ employees3419%4824%ISO 20022
By industry
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareISO 20022shareLeans
Technology & software5731%5929%UN/EDIFACT
Transport, logistics & rental3419%31%UN/EDIFACT
Manufacturing & industry3318%115%UN/EDIFACT
Utilities & infrastructure158%52%UN/EDIFACT
Business & finance services148%11557%ISO 20022
Automotive74%10%UN/EDIFACT
Commerce & trade74%10%UN/EDIFACT
Consumer services & leisure32%21%even
Hospitality & travel32%––outside top 12
Media & content32%31%even
Health care21%––outside top 12
Property & construction21%––outside top 12
Public, community & associations––21%outside top 12
By country
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareISO 20022shareLeans
United States8547%9246%even
Germany5128%199%UN/EDIFACT
France105%126%even
Canada63%84%even
United Kingdom53%2311%ISO 20022
Netherlands42%––outside top 12
Australia32%52%even
Austria21%––outside top 12
Italy21%––outside top 12
Sweden21%––outside top 12
Brazil11%––outside top 12
Switzerland11%31%even
India––52%outside top 12
Denmark––31%outside top 12
Lithuania––31%outside top 12
Portugal––31%outside top 12
Singapore––31%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentUN/EDIFACTshareISO 20022shareLeans
Software engineering13027%21426%even
IT operations & business systems12727%18923%UN/EDIFACT
Product, program & project management214%9411%ISO 20022
Data & AI123%172%even
General management & consulting92%111%even
Customer service & success51%51%even
Finance & accounting51%567%ISO 20022
Sales51%111%even
Marketing & communications41%40%even
Skilled trades and field service41%––outside top 12
Procurement and purchasing31%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)20%––outside top 12
Legal, compliance & risk––61%outside top 12
Business development & strategy––51%outside top 12
Manufacturing and production––40%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

ISO 20022 is named by 202 companies in job postings and UN/EDIFACT by 182; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/edifact-vs-iso-20022)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

UN/EDIFACT vs ISO 20022: questions

Which is more used, UN/EDIFACT or ISO 20022?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, ISO 20022 (202) over UN/EDIFACT (182). By website-and-DNS footprint, ISO 20022 (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses UN/EDIFACT?

28% of UN/EDIFACT companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 22% for ISO 20022. 47% of UN/EDIFACT companies have over 1,000 employees, against 57% for ISO 20022.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually UN/EDIFACT in marketing and ISO 20022 in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on UN/EDIFACT or ISO 20022. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market