Ember.js VS React Router
As of 30 October 2026, React Router is named by 115 companies and Ember.js by 136; Ember.js skews to companies under 200 people (55% vs 65%), React Router to companies over 1,000 (15% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ember.js's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, React Router rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Ember.js: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- React Router: 2–200 employees
- 65%
- Ember.js: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- React Router: 1,000+ employees
- 15%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 1.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Ember.js | share | React Router | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 6% | 20 | 17% | React Router |
| 11-50 employees | 38 | 28% | 32 | 28% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 29 | 21% | 23 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 13% | 14 | 12% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 11% | 7 | 6% | Ember.js |
| 1001-5000 employees | 12 | 9% | 8 | 7% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 4% | 4 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 8 | 6% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Segment | Ember.js | share | React Router | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 84 | 62% | 72 | 63% | even |
| Business & finance services | 31 | 23% | 19 | 17% | Ember.js |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 7% | 3 | 3% | Ember.js |
| Manufacturing & industry | 4 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 6 | 5% | React Router |
| Automotive | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ember.js | share | React Router | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 67% | 68 | 59% | Ember.js |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% | 10 | 9% | even |
| India | 9 | 7% | 7 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 4 | 3% | 6 | 5% | React Router |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 3 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Norway | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 2 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Argentina | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ember.js | share | React Router | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 514 | 86% | 282 | 91% | React Router |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 7 | 1% | 7 | 2% | even |
| Education & training | 7 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Ember.js →
Companies using React Router →
frontend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
React Router is named by 115 companies in job postings and Ember.js by 136; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ember-js-vs-react-router)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Ember.js vs React Router: questions
Which is more used, Ember.js or React Router?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Ember.js (136) over React Router (115). By website-and-DNS footprint, React Router (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Ember.js?
55% of Ember.js companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 65% for React Router. 19% of Ember.js companies have over 1,000 employees, against 15% for React Router.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Ember.js in marketing and React Router in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Ember.js or React Router. Start free, no card.