Ember.js VS TanStack Query
As of 30 October 2026, TanStack Query is named by 392 companies and Ember.js by 136; Ember.js skews to companies under 200 people (55% vs 60%), TanStack Query to companies over 1,000 (16% vs 19%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Ember.js's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, TanStack Query rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Ember.js: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- TanStack Query: 2–200 employees
- 60%
- Ember.js: 1,000+ employees
- 19%
- TanStack Query: 1,000+ employees
- 16%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 1.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Ember.js | share | TanStack Query | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 14 | 4% | TanStack Query |
| 2-10 employees | 8 | 6% | 61 | 16% | TanStack Query |
| 11-50 employees | 38 | 28% | 97 | 25% | Ember.js |
| 51-200 employees | 29 | 21% | 79 | 20% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 18 | 13% | 52 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 11% | 28 | 7% | Ember.js |
| 1001-5000 employees | 12 | 9% | 38 | 10% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 4% | 7 | 2% | Ember.js |
| 10,001+ employees | 8 | 6% | 16 | 4% | even |
| Segment | Ember.js | share | TanStack Query | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 84 | 62% | 239 | 61% | even |
| Business & finance services | 31 | 23% | 67 | 17% | Ember.js |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 7% | 11 | 3% | Ember.js |
| Manufacturing & industry | 4 | 3% | 14 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 4 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 21 | 5% | TanStack Query |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Automotive | – | – | 8 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ember.js | share | TanStack Query | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 91 | 67% | 216 | 55% | Ember.js |
| United Kingdom | 11 | 8% | 28 | 7% | even |
| India | 9 | 7% | 20 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 4 | 3% | 29 | 7% | TanStack Query |
| Sweden | 3 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 10 | 3% | even |
| Italy | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 13 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 4 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Ember.js | share | TanStack Query | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 514 | 86% | 837 | 93% | TanStack Query |
| IT operations & business systems | 8 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 7 | 1% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 7 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | 4 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Ember.js →
Companies using TanStack Query →
frontend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
TanStack Query is named by 392 companies in job postings and Ember.js by 136; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ember-js-vs-tanstack-query)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Ember.js vs TanStack Query: questions
Which is more used, Ember.js or TanStack Query?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, TanStack Query (392) over Ember.js (136). By website-and-DNS footprint, TanStack Query (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Ember.js?
55% of Ember.js companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 60% for TanStack Query. 19% of Ember.js companies have over 1,000 employees, against 16% for TanStack Query.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Ember.js in marketing and TanStack Query in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Ember.js or TanStack Query. Start free, no card.