Entity Framework Core VS Jakarta Persistence
As of 30 October 2026, Jakarta Persistence is named by 637 companies and Entity Framework Core by 399; Entity Framework Core skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 51%), Jakarta Persistence to companies over 1,000 (27% vs 32%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Entity Framework Core's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Jakarta Persistence rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Entity Framework Core: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- Jakarta Persistence: 2–200 employees
- 51%
- Entity Framework Core: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Jakarta Persistence: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 2.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Entity Framework Core | share | Jakarta Persistence | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 0% | 5 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 29 | 7% | 38 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 69 | 17% | 140 | 22% | Jakarta Persistence |
| 51-200 employees | 77 | 19% | 144 | 23% | Jakarta Persistence |
| 201-500 employees | 58 | 15% | 94 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 38 | 10% | 46 | 7% | Entity Framework Core |
| 1001-5000 employees | 67 | 17% | 77 | 12% | Entity Framework Core |
| 5001-10000 employees | 16 | 4% | 27 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 44 | 11% | 66 | 10% | even |
| Segment | Entity Framework Core | share | Jakarta Persistence | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 222 | 56% | 412 | 65% | Jakarta Persistence |
| Business & finance services | 80 | 20% | 134 | 21% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 33 | 8% | 23 | 4% | Entity Framework Core |
| Media & content | 13 | 3% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 9 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 2% | 14 | 2% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 8 | 2% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Commerce & trade | 7 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 7 | 2% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 2 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Entity Framework Core | share | Jakarta Persistence | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 192 | 48% | 293 | 46% | Entity Framework Core |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 10% | 37 | 6% | Entity Framework Core |
| Germany | 31 | 8% | 58 | 9% | even |
| India | 25 | 6% | 28 | 4% | even |
| Italy | 11 | 3% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 10 | 3% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 9 | 2% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 9 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 9 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| France | 8 | 2% | 34 | 5% | Jakarta Persistence |
| Belgium | 7 | 2% | 11 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 17 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 13 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Entity Framework Core | share | Jakarta Persistence | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 946 | 90% | 2,422 | 88% | Entity Framework Core |
| IT operations & business systems | 30 | 3% | 62 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 9 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 0% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 39 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Entity Framework Core →
Companies using Jakarta Persistence →
backend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Jakarta Persistence is named by 637 companies in job postings and Entity Framework Core by 399; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/entity-framework-core-vs-jakarta-persistence)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Entity Framework Core vs Jakarta Persistence: questions
Which is more used, Entity Framework Core or Jakarta Persistence?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Jakarta Persistence (637) over Entity Framework Core (399). By website-and-DNS footprint, Jakarta Persistence (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Entity Framework Core?
44% of Entity Framework Core companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 51% for Jakarta Persistence. 32% of Entity Framework Core companies have over 1,000 employees, against 27% for Jakarta Persistence.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Entity Framework Core in marketing and Jakarta Persistence in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Entity Framework Core or Jakarta Persistence. Start free, no card.