Entity Framework VS Hibernate
As of 30 October 2026, Hibernate is named by 1,384 companies and Entity Framework by 990; Entity Framework skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 55%), Hibernate to companies over 1,000 (24% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Entity Framework's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Hibernate rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Entity Framework: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Hibernate: 2–200 employees
- 55%
- Entity Framework: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Hibernate: 1,000+ employees
- 24%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.1 · 2.7
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Entity Framework | share | Hibernate | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 0% | 10 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 64 | 6% | 95 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 238 | 24% | 317 | 23% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 186 | 19% | 343 | 25% | Hibernate |
| 201-500 employees | 145 | 15% | 195 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 82 | 8% | 94 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 130 | 13% | 152 | 11% | Entity Framework |
| 5001-10000 employees | 43 | 4% | 48 | 3% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 98 | 10% | 130 | 9% | even |
| Segment | Entity Framework | share | Hibernate | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 586 | 59% | 940 | 68% | Hibernate |
| Business & finance services | 183 | 18% | 250 | 18% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 75 | 8% | 54 | 4% | Entity Framework |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 24 | 2% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 22 | 2% | 29 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 20 | 2% | 29 | 2% | even |
| Property & construction | 15 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 14 | 1% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 14 | 1% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Health care | 12 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 11 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Automotive | 8 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Entity Framework | share | Hibernate | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 490 | 49% | 698 | 50% | even |
| India | 70 | 7% | 104 | 8% | even |
| United Kingdom | 62 | 6% | 80 | 6% | even |
| Germany | 52 | 5% | 85 | 6% | even |
| France | 33 | 3% | 78 | 6% | Hibernate |
| Canada | 31 | 3% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 23 | 2% | 32 | 2% | even |
| Belgium | 22 | 2% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Netherlands | 22 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 21 | 2% | 26 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sweden | 13 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 21 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 20 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Romania | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Entity Framework | share | Hibernate | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 2,778 | 83% | 6,780 | 88% | Hibernate |
| IT operations & business systems | 112 | 3% | 196 | 3% | even |
| Unclassified | 60 | 2% | 82 | 1% | even |
| Data & AI | 31 | 1% | 67 | 1% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 31 | 1% | 37 | 0% | even |
| Design & UX | 27 | 1% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 18 | 1% | 41 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 7 | 0% | 13 | 0% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 7 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Sales | 7 | 0% | 4 | 0% | even |
| Education & training | 6 | 0% | 11 | 0% | even |
| Marketing & communications | 6 | 0% | 5 | 0% | even |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Entity Framework →
Companies using Hibernate →
backend frameworks ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Hibernate is named by 1,384 companies in job postings and Entity Framework by 990; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/entity-framework-vs-hibernate)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Entity Framework vs Hibernate: questions
Which is more used, Entity Framework or Hibernate?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Hibernate (1,384) over Entity Framework (990). By website-and-DNS footprint, Hibernate (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Entity Framework?
49% of Entity Framework companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 55% for Hibernate. 27% of Entity Framework companies have over 1,000 employees, against 24% for Hibernate.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Entity Framework in marketing and Hibernate in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Entity Framework or Hibernate. Start free, no card.