EPA SWMM VS GEOPAK
As of 30 October 2026, GEOPAK is named by 113 companies and EPA SWMM by 157; EPA SWMM skews to companies under 200 people (35% vs 27%), GEOPAK to companies over 1,000 (33% vs 36%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: EPA SWMM's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GEOPAK rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- EPA SWMM: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- GEOPAK: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- EPA SWMM: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- GEOPAK: 1,000+ employees
- 33%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.0 · 3.8
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | EPA SWMM | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 4 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 16 | 10% | 8 | 7% | EPA SWMM |
| 51-200 employees | 35 | 22% | 21 | 19% | EPA SWMM |
| 201-500 employees | 29 | 18% | 24 | 21% | GEOPAK |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 10% | 22 | 19% | GEOPAK |
| 1001-5000 employees | 34 | 22% | 26 | 23% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 9 | 6% | 2 | 2% | EPA SWMM |
| 10,001+ employees | 13 | 8% | 9 | 8% | even |
| Segment | EPA SWMM | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business & finance services | 109 | 69% | 75 | 66% | EPA SWMM |
| Property & construction | 31 | 20% | 36 | 32% | GEOPAK |
| Manufacturing & industry | 7 | 4% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Public, community & associations | 4 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Technology & software | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | EPA SWMM | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 126 | 80% | 107 | 95% | GEOPAK |
| Canada | 10 | 6% | 1 | 1% | EPA SWMM |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% | 2 | 2% | even |
| France | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Germany | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Segment | EPA SWMM | share | GEOPAK | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 487 | 77% | 422 | 69% | EPA SWMM |
| Construction and civil | 61 | 10% | 116 | 19% | GEOPAK |
| Quality, safety & environment | 15 | 2% | 3 | 0% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 7 | 1% | 5 | 1% | even |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Real estate and property | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using EPA SWMM →
Companies using GEOPAK →
civil infrastructure water ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GEOPAK is named by 113 companies in job postings and EPA SWMM by 157; 15 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/epa-swmm-vs-geopak)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
EPA SWMM vs GEOPAK: questions
Which is more used, EPA SWMM or GEOPAK?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, EPA SWMM (157) over GEOPAK (113). By website-and-DNS footprint, GEOPAK (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses EPA SWMM?
35% of EPA SWMM companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for GEOPAK. 36% of EPA SWMM companies have over 1,000 employees, against 33% for GEOPAK.
Do companies run both?
15 companies name both in their postings, usually EPA SWMM in marketing and GEOPAK in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on EPA SWMM or GEOPAK. Start free, no card.