Epicor ERP VS QAD
As of 30 October 2026, QAD is named by 135 companies and Epicor ERP by 156; Epicor ERP skews to companies under 200 people (34% vs 11%), QAD to companies over 1,000 (64% vs 17%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Epicor ERP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, QAD rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Epicor ERP: 2–200 employees
- 34%
- QAD: 2–200 employees
- 11%
- Epicor ERP: 1,000+ employees
- 17%
- QAD: 1,000+ employees
- 64%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.9 · 3.5
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Epicor ERP | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 6 | 4% | 1 | 1% | Epicor ERP |
| 51-200 employees | 45 | 29% | 12 | 9% | Epicor ERP |
| 201-500 employees | 51 | 33% | 18 | 13% | Epicor ERP |
| 501-1000 employees | 26 | 17% | 16 | 12% | Epicor ERP |
| 1001-5000 employees | 21 | 13% | 32 | 24% | QAD |
| 10,001+ employees | 5 | 3% | 39 | 29% | QAD |
| 5001-10000 employees | – | – | 15 | 11% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Epicor ERP | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 105 | 67% | 93 | 69% | even |
| Automotive | 14 | 9% | 15 | 11% | QAD |
| Business & finance services | 11 | 7% | 8 | 6% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 10 | 6% | 3 | 2% | Epicor ERP |
| Property & construction | 5 | 3% | 1 | 1% | Epicor ERP |
| Technology & software | 5 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Health care | 1 | 1% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality & travel | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Utilities & infrastructure | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Epicor ERP | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 136 | 87% | 99 | 73% | Epicor ERP |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 5% | 4 | 3% | Epicor ERP |
| Australia | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Canada | 2 | 1% | 7 | 5% | QAD |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| India | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Italy | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Lithuania | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 1 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Germany | – | – | 6 | 4% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 4 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Austria | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Epicor ERP | share | QAD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IT operations & business systems | 61 | 17% | 44 | 8% | Epicor ERP |
| Finance & accounting | 49 | 14% | 86 | 15% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 40 | 11% | 122 | 22% | QAD |
| Engineering (non-software) | 30 | 9% | 33 | 6% | Epicor ERP |
| Manufacturing and production | 24 | 7% | 30 | 5% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 24 | 7% | 13 | 2% | Epicor ERP |
| Procurement and purchasing | 16 | 5% | 42 | 8% | QAD |
| Sales | 13 | 4% | 12 | 2% | even |
| Software engineering | 12 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | 8 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 7 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 7 | 2% | 17 | 3% | even |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 27 | 5% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 14 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 9 | 2% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Epicor ERP →
Companies using QAD →
ERP suites ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
QAD is named by 135 companies in job postings and Epicor ERP by 156; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/epicor-erp-vs-qad)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Epicor ERP vs QAD: questions
Which is more used, Epicor ERP or QAD?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Epicor ERP (156) over QAD (135). By website-and-DNS footprint, QAD (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Epicor ERP?
34% of Epicor ERP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 11% for QAD. 17% of Epicor ERP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 64% for QAD.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually Epicor ERP in marketing and QAD in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Epicor ERP or QAD. Start free, no card.