Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · robotics autonomy

FANUC VS KUKA

As of 4 November 2026, KUKA is named by 469 companies and FANUC by 1,627; FANUC skews to companies under 200 people (43% vs 41%), KUKA to companies over 1,000 (38% vs 32%).

As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FANUC's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, KUKA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

FANUC: 2–200 employees
43%
KUKA: 2–200 employees
41%
FANUC: 1,000+ employees
32%
KUKA: 1,000+ employees
38%
Postings per company, 90 days
3.4 · 2.1
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
1,627companies name FANUC
469companies name KUKA
415name both
5,528 · 998postings in 90 days, FANUC · KUKA
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentFANUCshareKUKAshareLeans
Self-employed161%71%even
2-10 employees16010%368%FANUC
11-50 employees18912%6414%KUKA
51-200 employees35522%9019%FANUC
201-500 employees24015%449%FANUC
501-1000 employees1489%5011%even
1001-5000 employees21913%6714%even
5001-10000 employees745%194%even
10,001+ employees22614%9220%KUKA
By industry
SegmentFANUCshareKUKAshareLeans
Manufacturing & industry1,08367%28861%FANUC
Automotive15510%5612%KUKA
Business & finance services956%327%even
Commerce & trade664%163%even
Technology & software543%255%KUKA
Utilities & infrastructure352%82%even
Consumer services & leisure312%123%even
Public, community & associations282%112%even
Media & content262%92%even
Property & construction262%51%even
Health care111%31%even
Transport, logistics & rental101%31%even
By country
SegmentFANUCshareKUKAshareLeans
United States87454%20243%FANUC
Germany26816%12326%KUKA
United Kingdom785%102%FANUC
France563%225%even
Canada493%163%even
Italy292%––outside top 12
Switzerland272%41%even
Poland252%102%even
Netherlands231%––outside top 12
India221%92%even
Austria201%71%even
Spain141%133%even
Sweden––61%outside top 12
Czechia––41%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentFANUCshareKUKAshareLeans
Manufacturing and production2,96244%625%FANUC
Engineering (non-software)1,42821%59546%KUKA
Skilled trades and field service1,21518%36028%KUKA
Unclassified681%30%even
Sales641%222%even
Software engineering501%322%even
Education & training250%50%even
Product, program & project management140%91%even
Quality, safety & environment100%10%even
Customer service & success80%30%even
Data & AI80%71%even
Construction and civil40%10%even
IT operations & business systems30%40%even
Business development & strategy20%20%even
Facilities cleaning and security10%20%even
General management & consulting10%––outside top 12
Hospitality and food service10%––outside top 12
Logistics warehouse and transport10%20%even
Research and science––20%outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Marketing & communications––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

KUKA is named by 469 companies in job postings and FANUC by 1,627; 415 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/fanuc-vs-kuka)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

FANUC vs KUKA: questions

Which is more used, FANUC or KUKA?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, FANUC (1,627) over KUKA (469). By website-and-DNS footprint, KUKA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses FANUC?

43% of FANUC companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for KUKA. 32% of FANUC companies have over 1,000 employees, against 38% for KUKA.

Do companies run both?

415 companies name both in their postings, usually FANUC in marketing and KUKA in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on FANUC or KUKA. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market