FANUC VS Universal Robots
As of 30 October 2026, Universal Robots is named by 120 companies and FANUC by 1,286; FANUC skews to companies under 200 people (42% vs 35%), Universal Robots to companies over 1,000 (39% vs 32%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FANUC's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Universal Robots rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- FANUC: 2–200 employees
- 42%
- Universal Robots: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- FANUC: 1,000+ employees
- 32%
- Universal Robots: 1,000+ employees
- 39%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | FANUC | share | Universal Robots | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 4 | 0% | 2 | 2% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 107 | 8% | 11 | 9% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 154 | 12% | 13 | 11% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 279 | 22% | 18 | 15% | FANUC |
| 201-500 employees | 206 | 16% | 13 | 11% | FANUC |
| 501-1000 employees | 123 | 10% | 16 | 13% | Universal Robots |
| 1001-5000 employees | 169 | 13% | 14 | 12% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 64 | 5% | 8 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 180 | 14% | 25 | 21% | Universal Robots |
| Segment | FANUC | share | Universal Robots | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 891 | 69% | 61 | 51% | FANUC |
| Automotive | 128 | 10% | 12 | 10% | even |
| Business & finance services | 54 | 4% | 11 | 9% | Universal Robots |
| Commerce & trade | 50 | 4% | 6 | 5% | even |
| Technology & software | 39 | 3% | 10 | 8% | Universal Robots |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 28 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 21 | 2% | 5 | 4% | Universal Robots |
| Property & construction | 21 | 2% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 18 | 1% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Media & content | 15 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Health care | 10 | 1% | 5 | 4% | Universal Robots |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 7 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | FANUC | share | Universal Robots | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 689 | 54% | 82 | 68% | Universal Robots |
| Germany | 223 | 17% | 15 | 13% | FANUC |
| United Kingdom | 69 | 5% | 6 | 5% | even |
| France | 47 | 4% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 45 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Switzerland | 26 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 24 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 22 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 20 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 17 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| India | 15 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 10 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Australia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FANUC | share | Universal Robots | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing and production | 2,407 | 45% | 4 | 1% | FANUC |
| Engineering (non-software) | 1,276 | 24% | 205 | 58% | Universal Robots |
| Skilled trades and field service | 1,144 | 21% | 42 | 12% | FANUC |
| Sales | 54 | 1% | 18 | 5% | Universal Robots |
| Software engineering | 42 | 1% | 11 | 3% | Universal Robots |
| Education & training | 24 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 14 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 9 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 8 | 0% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Unclassified | 5 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | 4 | 0% | 9 | 3% | Universal Robots |
| Construction and civil | 3 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 7 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using FANUC →
Companies using Universal Robots →
robotics autonomy ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Universal Robots is named by 120 companies in job postings and FANUC by 1,286; 139 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/fanuc-vs-universal-robots)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FANUC vs Universal Robots: questions
Which is more used, FANUC or Universal Robots?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, FANUC (1,286) over Universal Robots (120). By website-and-DNS footprint, Universal Robots (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses FANUC?
42% of FANUC companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Universal Robots. 32% of FANUC companies have over 1,000 employees, against 39% for Universal Robots.
Do companies run both?
139 companies name both in their postings, usually FANUC in marketing and Universal Robots in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on FANUC or Universal Robots. Start free, no card.