FigJam VS Miro
As of 4 November 2026, Miro is named by 1,219 companies and FigJam by 188; FigJam skews to companies under 200 people (51% vs 38%), Miro to companies over 1,000 (35% vs 25%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FigJam's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Miro rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- FigJam: 2–200 employees
- 51%
- Miro: 2–200 employees
- 38%
- FigJam: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Miro: 1,000+ employees
- 35%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.7 · 2.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 11,849
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | FigJam | share | Miro | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 9 | 5% | 35 | 3% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 27 | 14% | 106 | 9% | FigJam |
| 11-50 employees | 34 | 18% | 148 | 12% | FigJam |
| 51-200 employees | 35 | 19% | 212 | 17% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 20 | 11% | 177 | 15% | Miro |
| 501-1000 employees | 16 | 9% | 111 | 9% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 20 | 11% | 205 | 17% | Miro |
| 5001-10000 employees | 4 | 2% | 68 | 6% | Miro |
| 10,001+ employees | 23 | 12% | 157 | 13% | even |
| Segment | FigJam | share | Miro | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 94 | 50% | 381 | 31% | FigJam |
| Business & finance services | 47 | 25% | 340 | 28% | Miro |
| Manufacturing & industry | 12 | 6% | 99 | 8% | even |
| Media & content | 9 | 5% | 90 | 7% | Miro |
| Consumer services & leisure | 8 | 4% | 63 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 2% | 65 | 5% | Miro |
| Public, community & associations | 3 | 2% | 53 | 4% | Miro |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 2% | 21 | 2% | even |
| Automotive | 2 | 1% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 1% | 18 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 44 | 4% | Miro |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 2 | 1% | 17 | 1% | even |
| Segment | FigJam | share | Miro | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 106 | 56% | 579 | 47% | FigJam |
| India | 10 | 5% | 17 | 1% | FigJam |
| Brazil | 8 | 4% | 53 | 4% | even |
| France | 8 | 4% | 35 | 3% | even |
| Poland | 5 | 3% | 25 | 2% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 30 | 2% | even |
| Germany | 4 | 2% | 124 | 10% | Miro |
| Spain | 4 | 2% | 10 | 1% | even |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% | 113 | 9% | Miro |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 4 | 2% | 12 | 1% | even |
| Italy | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | – | – | 25 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 15 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FigJam | share | Miro | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Design & UX | 235 | 60% | 586 | 19% | FigJam |
| Product, program & project management | 34 | 9% | 619 | 20% | Miro |
| Software engineering | 19 | 5% | 162 | 5% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 11 | 3% | 412 | 13% | Miro |
| Marketing & communications | 8 | 2% | 95 | 3% | even |
| General management & consulting | 5 | 1% | 124 | 4% | Miro |
| Sales | 5 | 1% | 53 | 2% | even |
| Data & AI | 3 | 1% | 95 | 3% | Miro |
| Arts media and entertainment | 2 | 1% | 23 | 1% | even |
| Business development & strategy | 2 | 1% | 44 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 2 | 1% | 32 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 2 | 1% | 35 | 1% | even |
| Administration & office | 1 | 0% | 23 | 1% | even |
| Quality, safety & environment | 1 | 0% | 13 | 0% | even |
| Research and science | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Retail & store operations | 1 | 0% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Unclassified | 1 | 0% | 16 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 89 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 58 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 27 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 18 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Travel, leisure & events | – | – | 5 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Skilled trades and field service | – | – | 4 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Real estate and property | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using FigJam →
Companies using Miro →
whiteboards diagramming ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Miro is named by 1,219 companies in job postings and FigJam by 188; 94 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/figjam-vs-miro)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FigJam vs Miro: questions
Which is more used, FigJam or Miro?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Miro (1,219) over FigJam (188). By website-and-DNS footprint, Miro (11,849 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses FigJam?
51% of FigJam companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 38% for Miro. 25% of FigJam companies have over 1,000 employees, against 35% for Miro.
Do companies run both?
94 companies name both in their postings, usually FigJam in marketing and Miro in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on FigJam or Miro. Start free, no card.