FileMaker VS Microsoft Power Apps
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Power Apps is named by 1,831 companies and FileMaker by 100; FileMaker skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 27%), Microsoft Power Apps to companies over 1,000 (48% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FileMaker's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Power Apps rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- FileMaker: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Microsoft Power Apps: 2–200 employees
- 27%
- FileMaker: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Microsoft Power Apps: 1,000+ employees
- 48%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 4.0
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Apps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 12% | 62 | 3% | FileMaker |
| 11-50 employees | 20 | 20% | 166 | 9% | FileMaker |
| 51-200 employees | 17 | 17% | 275 | 15% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 13 | 13% | 239 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 11% | 201 | 11% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 8 | 8% | 351 | 19% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 7% | 139 | 8% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 12 | 12% | 390 | 21% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Self-employed | – | – | 8 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Apps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public, community & associations | 19 | 19% | 65 | 4% | FileMaker |
| Manufacturing & industry | 15 | 15% | 377 | 21% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Technology & software | 12 | 12% | 467 | 26% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Media & content | 10 | 10% | 21 | 1% | FileMaker |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 9% | 40 | 2% | FileMaker |
| Health care | 9 | 9% | 42 | 2% | FileMaker |
| Business & finance services | 8 | 8% | 432 | 24% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Property & construction | 6 | 6% | 88 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 4% | 82 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 103 | 6% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 53 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 46 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Apps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 76% | 942 | 51% | FileMaker |
| Canada | 6 | 6% | 84 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 5 | 5% | 150 | 8% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Italy | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% | 142 | 8% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 61 | 3% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| France | 1 | 1% | 58 | 3% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 29 | 2% | even |
| India | – | – | 40 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | – | – | 28 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 27 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 26 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 23 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Apps | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration & office | 30 | 9% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 23 | 7% | 233 | 3% | FileMaker |
| Software engineering | 23 | 7% | 2,032 | 24% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 17 | 5% | 83 | 1% | FileMaker |
| Research and science | 15 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 13 | 4% | 226 | 3% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 12 | 4% | 2,264 | 26% | Microsoft Power Apps |
| Arts media and entertainment | 11 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 10 | 3% | 136 | 2% | even |
| Sales | 10 | 3% | 88 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 888 | 10% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 254 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 204 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 87 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 65 | 1% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using FileMaker →
Companies using Microsoft Power Apps →
low code bpm rpa ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Power Apps is named by 1,831 companies in job postings and FileMaker by 100; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/filemaker-vs-microsoft-power-apps)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FileMaker vs Microsoft Power Apps: questions
Which is more used, FileMaker or Microsoft Power Apps?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Power Apps (1,831) over FileMaker (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Power Apps (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses FileMaker?
49% of FileMaker companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 27% for Microsoft Power Apps. 27% of FileMaker companies have over 1,000 employees, against 48% for Microsoft Power Apps.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually FileMaker in marketing and Microsoft Power Apps in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on FileMaker or Microsoft Power Apps. Start free, no card.