FileMaker VS Microsoft Power Platform
As of 30 October 2026, Microsoft Power Platform is named by 2,289 companies and FileMaker by 100; FileMaker skews to companies under 200 people (49% vs 28%), Microsoft Power Platform to companies over 1,000 (45% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FileMaker's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Microsoft Power Platform rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- FileMaker: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- Microsoft Power Platform: 2–200 employees
- 28%
- FileMaker: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- Microsoft Power Platform: 1,000+ employees
- 45%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.3 · 3.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Platform | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 12 | 12% | 79 | 3% | FileMaker |
| 11-50 employees | 20 | 20% | 206 | 9% | FileMaker |
| 51-200 employees | 17 | 17% | 358 | 16% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 13 | 13% | 337 | 15% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 11 | 11% | 268 | 12% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 8 | 8% | 468 | 20% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| 5001-10000 employees | 7 | 7% | 152 | 7% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 12 | 12% | 410 | 18% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Self-employed | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Platform | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Public, community & associations | 19 | 19% | 80 | 3% | FileMaker |
| Manufacturing & industry | 15 | 15% | 437 | 19% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Technology & software | 12 | 12% | 612 | 27% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Media & content | 10 | 10% | 36 | 2% | FileMaker |
| Consumer services & leisure | 9 | 9% | 72 | 3% | FileMaker |
| Health care | 9 | 9% | 64 | 3% | FileMaker |
| Business & finance services | 8 | 8% | 534 | 23% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Property & construction | 6 | 6% | 119 | 5% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 4 | 4% | 90 | 4% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 115 | 5% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Automotive | 2 | 2% | 54 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Transport, logistics & rental | – | – | 49 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Platform | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 76 | 76% | 1,132 | 49% | FileMaker |
| Canada | 6 | 6% | 99 | 4% | even |
| Germany | 5 | 5% | 211 | 9% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Italy | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% | 192 | 8% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 1% | 74 | 3% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% | 32 | 1% | even |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% | 28 | 1% | even |
| France | 1 | 1% | 76 | 3% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% | 53 | 2% | even |
| India | – | – | 46 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 37 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Spain | – | – | 33 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | FileMaker | share | Microsoft Power Platform | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administration & office | 30 | 9% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 23 | 7% | 390 | 4% | FileMaker |
| Software engineering | 23 | 7% | 2,630 | 25% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 17 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 15 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | 13 | 4% | 238 | 2% | even |
| IT operations & business systems | 12 | 4% | 3,096 | 29% | Microsoft Power Platform |
| Arts media and entertainment | 11 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | 10 | 3% | 65 | 1% | FileMaker |
| Sales | 10 | 3% | 209 | 2% | even |
| Education & training | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Manufacturing and production | 6 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Data & AI | – | – | 1,151 | 11% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 265 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Engineering (non-software) | – | – | 184 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 52 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Legal, compliance & risk | – | – | 50 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Human resources | – | – | 49 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using FileMaker →
Companies using Microsoft Power Platform →
low code bpm rpa ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Microsoft Power Platform is named by 2,289 companies in job postings and FileMaker by 100; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/filemaker-vs-microsoft-power-platform)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FileMaker vs Microsoft Power Platform: questions
Which is more used, FileMaker or Microsoft Power Platform?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Microsoft Power Platform (2,289) over FileMaker (100). By website-and-DNS footprint, Microsoft Power Platform (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses FileMaker?
49% of FileMaker companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 28% for Microsoft Power Platform. 27% of FileMaker companies have over 1,000 employees, against 45% for Microsoft Power Platform.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually FileMaker in marketing and Microsoft Power Platform in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on FileMaker or Microsoft Power Platform. Start free, no card.