Flux CD VS GitLab CI/CD
As of 30 October 2026, GitLab CI/CD is named by 2,802 companies and Flux CD by 140; Flux CD skews to companies under 200 people (44% vs 50%), GitLab CI/CD to companies over 1,000 (26% vs 27%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Flux CD's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, GitLab CI/CD rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- Flux CD: 2–200 employees
- 44%
- GitLab CI/CD: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Flux CD: 1,000+ employees
- 27%
- GitLab CI/CD: 1,000+ employees
- 26%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 2.0 · 2.9
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | Flux CD | share | GitLab CI/CD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 2% | 24 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 11 | 8% | 206 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 20 | 14% | 526 | 19% | GitLab CI/CD |
| 51-200 employees | 31 | 22% | 655 | 23% | even |
| 201-500 employees | 16 | 11% | 422 | 15% | GitLab CI/CD |
| 501-1000 employees | 21 | 15% | 252 | 9% | Flux CD |
| 1001-5000 employees | 20 | 14% | 355 | 13% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 5 | 4% | 107 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 13 | 9% | 255 | 9% | even |
| Segment | Flux CD | share | GitLab CI/CD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 85 | 61% | 1,556 | 56% | Flux CD |
| Business & finance services | 29 | 21% | 530 | 19% | even |
| Manufacturing & industry | 10 | 7% | 308 | 11% | GitLab CI/CD |
| Media & content | 5 | 4% | 81 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 4 | 3% | 53 | 2% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 3 | 2% | 50 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 44 | 2% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | 15 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 40 | 1% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | – | – | 48 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Automotive | – | – | 35 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Health care | – | – | 25 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Flux CD | share | GitLab CI/CD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 79 | 56% | 1,486 | 53% | Flux CD |
| Germany | 13 | 9% | 246 | 9% | even |
| United Kingdom | 10 | 7% | 182 | 6% | even |
| Australia | 5 | 4% | 30 | 1% | Flux CD |
| France | 5 | 4% | 170 | 6% | GitLab CI/CD |
| Poland | 4 | 3% | 55 | 2% | even |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Bulgaria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Canada | 1 | 1% | 64 | 2% | even |
| India | – | – | 96 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 52 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 38 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | – | – | 37 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Italy | – | – | 28 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | Flux CD | share | GitLab CI/CD | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 294 | 76% | 7,527 | 71% | Flux CD |
| IT operations & business systems | 41 | 11% | 1,136 | 11% | even |
| Data & AI | 17 | 4% | 655 | 6% | even |
| Engineering (non-software) | 4 | 1% | 288 | 3% | even |
| Product, program & project management | 4 | 1% | 65 | 1% | even |
| Finance & accounting | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 54 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Sales | – | – | 26 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 17 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 15 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 10 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 6 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using Flux CD →
Companies using GitLab CI/CD →
ci cd ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
GitLab CI/CD is named by 2,802 companies in job postings and Flux CD by 140; 82 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/fluxcd-vs-gitlab-ci)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
Flux CD vs GitLab CI/CD: questions
Which is more used, Flux CD or GitLab CI/CD?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, GitLab CI/CD (2,802) over Flux CD (140). By website-and-DNS footprint, GitLab CI/CD (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses Flux CD?
44% of Flux CD companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for GitLab CI/CD. 27% of Flux CD companies have over 1,000 employees, against 26% for GitLab CI/CD.
Do companies run both?
82 companies name both in their postings, usually Flux CD in marketing and GitLab CI/CD in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on Flux CD or GitLab CI/CD. Start free, no card.