Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · network protocols

FTP VS Spanning Tree Protocol

As of 30 October 2026, Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies and FTP by 522; FTP skews to companies under 200 people (36% vs 35%), Spanning Tree Protocol to companies over 1,000 (44% vs 41%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: FTP's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Spanning Tree Protocol rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

FTP: 2–200 employees
36%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 2–200 employees
35%
FTP: 1,000+ employees
41%
Spanning Tree Protocol: 1,000+ employees
44%
Postings per company, 90 days
1.8 · 3.2
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
522companies name FTP
234companies name Spanning Tree Protocol
0name both
942 · 747postings in 90 days, FTP · Spanning Tree Protocol
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentFTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Self-employed51%31%even
2-10 employees265%125%even
11-50 employees6913%2511%FTP
51-200 employees9418%4519%even
201-500 employees6613%3113%even
501-1000 employees479%167%FTP
1001-5000 employees11622%4118%FTP
5001-10000 employees275%2310%Spanning Tree Protocol
10,001+ employees7214%3816%Spanning Tree Protocol
By industry
SegmentFTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
Technology & software20639%10344%Spanning Tree Protocol
Business & finance services12123%3515%FTP
Manufacturing & industry5711%3013%even
Media & content245%104%even
Property & construction204%73%even
Public, community & associations183%42%even
Transport, logistics & rental143%52%even
Consumer services & leisure132%94%even
Utilities & infrastructure132%156%Spanning Tree Protocol
Commerce & trade122%42%even
Health care122%52%even
Automotive112%52%even
By country
SegmentFTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
United States32161%14763%even
United Kingdom377%83%FTP
Germany275%156%even
India183%94%even
Canada143%63%even
France143%136%Spanning Tree Protocol
Brazil102%52%even
Australia61%––outside top 12
Belgium61%––outside top 12
Italy61%73%even
Poland61%––outside top 12
Romania61%––outside top 12
Switzerland––31%outside top 12
Japan––31%outside top 12
Netherlands––21%outside top 12
Sweden––21%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentFTPshareSpanning Tree ProtocolshareLeans
IT operations & business systems51833%60959%Spanning Tree Protocol
Software engineering32821%959%FTP
Customer service & success805%323%FTP
Data & AI473%––outside top 12
Engineering (non-software)453%222%even
Product, program & project management423%61%FTP
Administration & office221%––outside top 12
Sales191%374%Spanning Tree Protocol
Arts media and entertainment151%––outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service141%––outside top 12
Finance & accounting131%10%even
Legal, compliance & risk131%10%even
General management & consulting––61%outside top 12
Design & UX––20%outside top 12
Human resources––20%outside top 12
Quality, safety & environment––20%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

Spanning Tree Protocol is named by 234 companies in job postings and FTP by 522; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/ftp-vs-spanning-tree-protocol)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

FTP vs Spanning Tree Protocol: questions

Which is more used, FTP or Spanning Tree Protocol?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, FTP (522) over Spanning Tree Protocol (234). By website-and-DNS footprint, Spanning Tree Protocol (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses FTP?

36% of FTP companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Spanning Tree Protocol. 41% of FTP companies have over 1,000 employees, against 44% for Spanning Tree Protocol.

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually FTP in marketing and Spanning Tree Protocol in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on FTP or Spanning Tree Protocol. Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market