G-code VS Haas CNC
As of 4 November 2026, Haas CNC is named by 542 companies and G-code by 238; G-code skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 49%), Haas CNC to companies over 1,000 (25% vs 31%).
As of 4 November 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: G-code's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Haas CNC rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- G-code: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Haas CNC: 2–200 employees
- 49%
- G-code: 1,000+ employees
- 31%
- Haas CNC: 1,000+ employees
- 25%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.5 · 2.3
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | G-code | share | Haas CNC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 2 | 1% | 4 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 14 | 6% | 36 | 7% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 19 | 8% | 65 | 12% | Haas CNC |
| 51-200 employees | 65 | 27% | 164 | 30% | Haas CNC |
| 201-500 employees | 49 | 21% | 97 | 18% | G-code |
| 501-1000 employees | 15 | 6% | 41 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 29 | 12% | 68 | 13% | even |
| 5001-10000 employees | 11 | 5% | 21 | 4% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 34 | 14% | 46 | 8% | G-code |
| Segment | G-code | share | Haas CNC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 177 | 74% | 405 | 75% | even |
| Business & finance services | 12 | 5% | 24 | 4% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 12 | 5% | 24 | 4% | even |
| Automotive | 10 | 4% | 28 | 5% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 8 | 3% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 2% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 4 | 2% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Technology & software | 4 | 2% | 13 | 2% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 10 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 2 | 1% | 6 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Agriculture & forestry | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | G-code | share | Haas CNC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 180 | 76% | 432 | 80% | Haas CNC |
| Germany | 11 | 5% | 22 | 4% | even |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 4% | 25 | 5% | even |
| Canada | 6 | 3% | 18 | 3% | even |
| Austria | 4 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| France | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 2 | 1% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Denmark | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| MY | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Singapore | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| AF | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 5 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Poland | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| India | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | G-code | share | Haas CNC | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing and production | 386 | 83% | 1,205 | 81% | G-code |
| Engineering (non-software) | 34 | 7% | 46 | 3% | G-code |
| Skilled trades and field service | 13 | 3% | 131 | 9% | Haas CNC |
| Software engineering | 5 | 1% | 1 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 2 | 0% | 14 | 1% | even |
| Education & training | – | – | 7 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Facilities cleaning and security | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Administration & office | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| General management & consulting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using G-code →
Companies using Haas CNC →
cam cnc ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Haas CNC is named by 542 companies in job postings and G-code by 238; 46 name both. (Breaknorm, 4 November 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/g-code-vs-haas-cnc)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
G-code vs Haas CNC: questions
Which is more used, G-code or Haas CNC?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Haas CNC (542) over G-code (238). By website-and-DNS footprint, Haas CNC (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses G-code?
41% of G-code companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 49% for Haas CNC. 31% of G-code companies have over 1,000 employees, against 25% for Haas CNC.
Do companies run both?
46 companies name both in their postings, usually G-code in marketing and Haas CNC in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on G-code or Haas CNC. Start free, no card.