Breaknorm
Sign inStart free

Product

SignalsPeopleCompaniesLocal businessesMCP and API

Plays

Post engagersTeam build-outChampion movedHiring surgeNewly fundedLookalikesAll plays

Data

Coverage by countryHiring dataJob changesEmail verificationCompanies by toolWho is hiringMarket mapsOutboundCompany profilesCompare
PricingDatasetsDocsSign in
Compare · test automation

Gatling VS UFT (Unified Functional Testing)

As of 30 October 2026, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) is named by 185 companies and Gatling by 265; Gatling skews to companies under 200 people (40% vs 50%), UFT (Unified Functional Testing) to companies over 1,000 (29% vs 33%).

As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.

The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: Gatling's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.

Gatling: 2–200 employees
40%
UFT (Unified Functional Testing): 2–200 employees
50%
Gatling: 1,000+ employees
33%
UFT (Unified Functional Testing): 1,000+ employees
29%
Postings per company, 90 days
2.2 · 3.5
Website or DNS footprint
0 · 0
265companies name Gatling
185companies name UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
0name both
586 · 647postings in 90 days, Gatling · UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
02Side by side

Who chooses which

Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.

By company size
SegmentGatlingshareUFT (Unified Functional Testing)shareLeans
2-10 employees135%84%even
11-50 employees4517%3821%UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
51-200 employees4918%4725%UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
201-500 employees4015%2413%Gatling
501-1000 employees3011%137%Gatling
1001-5000 employees5019%2916%Gatling
5001-10000 employees114%116%even
10,001+ employees2710%148%Gatling
Self-employed––11%outside top 12
By industry
SegmentGatlingshareUFT (Unified Functional Testing)shareLeans
Technology & software15960%13070%UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
Business & finance services6625%2815%Gatling
Manufacturing & industry83%95%even
Media & content62%42%even
Commerce & trade52%11%even
Transport, logistics & rental52%21%even
Utilities & infrastructure52%42%even
Property & construction42%11%even
Consumer services & leisure31%42%even
Public, community & associations21%––outside top 12
Hospitality & travel21%––outside top 12
Health care––21%outside top 12
By country
SegmentGatlingshareUFT (Unified Functional Testing)shareLeans
United States16261%12165%UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
United Kingdom249%137%Gatling
France135%95%even
India114%74%even
Australia52%42%even
Germany52%84%UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
Poland52%––outside top 12
Singapore52%32%even
Switzerland42%21%even
Spain42%––outside top 12
Belgium31%21%even
Canada31%32%even
PK––21%outside top 12
Bulgaria––11%outside top 12
Postings by team (share of each tool's postings)
SegmentGatlingshareUFT (Unified Functional Testing)shareLeans
Software engineering59175%1,11081%UFT (Unified Functional Testing)
Data & AI668%91%Gatling
Quality, safety & environment375%423%even
IT operations & business systems172%554%even
Engineering (non-software)162%463%even
Unclassified30%40%even
General management & consulting10%30%even
Product, program & project management10%30%even
Sales10%––outside top 12
Administration & office––10%outside top 12
Human resources––10%outside top 12
Procurement and purchasing––10%outside top 12
Skilled trades and field service––10%outside top 12
Cite this

Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.

UFT (Unified Functional Testing) is named by 185 companies in job postings and Gatling by 265; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gatling-vs-uft)
How we know

Read from the source, not self-reported

Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →

  • Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
  • Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
  • SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
  • Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
FAQ

Gatling vs UFT (Unified Functional Testing): questions

Which is more used, Gatling or UFT (Unified Functional Testing)?

By companies naming it in their own job postings, Gatling (265) over UFT (Unified Functional Testing) (185). By website-and-DNS footprint, UFT (Unified Functional Testing) (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.

Who chooses Gatling?

40% of Gatling companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 50% for UFT (Unified Functional Testing). 33% of Gatling companies have over 1,000 employees, against 29% for UFT (Unified Functional Testing).

Do companies run both?

0 companies name both in their postings, usually Gatling in marketing and UFT (Unified Functional Testing) in sales, or during a migration.

Where do these numbers come from?

From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.

Companies and people

Get either list your way

The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.

Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it

Filter on Gatling or UFT (Unified Functional Testing). Start free, no card.

  1. 01Sign up, no card
  2. 02Connect Claude, ChatGPT or an API key
  3. 03Ask for your market