GDAL VS Leapfrog Geo
As of 30 October 2026, Leapfrog Geo is named by 119 companies and GDAL by 108; GDAL skews to companies under 200 people (66% vs 26%), Leapfrog Geo to companies over 1,000 (52% vs 21%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GDAL's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Leapfrog Geo rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- GDAL: 2–200 employees
- 66%
- Leapfrog Geo: 2–200 employees
- 26%
- GDAL: 1,000+ employees
- 21%
- Leapfrog Geo: 1,000+ employees
- 52%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 1.6 · 3.1
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | GDAL | share | Leapfrog Geo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| 2-10 employees | 10 | 9% | 6 | 5% | GDAL |
| 11-50 employees | 22 | 20% | 13 | 11% | GDAL |
| 51-200 employees | 39 | 36% | 12 | 10% | GDAL |
| 201-500 employees | 6 | 6% | 13 | 11% | Leapfrog Geo |
| 501-1000 employees | 7 | 6% | 13 | 11% | Leapfrog Geo |
| 1001-5000 employees | 12 | 11% | 25 | 21% | Leapfrog Geo |
| 5001-10000 employees | 3 | 3% | 10 | 8% | Leapfrog Geo |
| 10,001+ employees | 8 | 7% | 27 | 23% | Leapfrog Geo |
| Segment | GDAL | share | Leapfrog Geo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 39 | 36% | 4 | 3% | GDAL |
| Business & finance services | 36 | 33% | 31 | 26% | GDAL |
| Manufacturing & industry | 12 | 11% | 51 | 43% | Leapfrog Geo |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 5% | 6 | 5% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 4 | 4% | 1 | 1% | GDAL |
| Agriculture & forestry | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Property & construction | 3 | 3% | 4 | 3% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 3 | 3% | 3 | 3% | even |
| Hospitality & travel | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Media & content | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 16 | 13% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GDAL | share | Leapfrog Geo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 62 | 57% | 70 | 59% | even |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 6% | 4 | 3% | GDAL |
| Canada | 5 | 5% | 12 | 10% | Leapfrog Geo |
| Germany | 5 | 5% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Poland | 3 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Sweden | 2 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Austria | 1 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% | 2 | 2% | even |
| Australia | – | – | 18 | 15% | outside top 12 |
| CD | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| France | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| GH | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Greece | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| ID | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GDAL | share | Leapfrog Geo | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data & AI | 118 | 46% | 6 | 1% | GDAL |
| Software engineering | 55 | 21% | 2 | 0% | GDAL |
| Sales | 8 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Research and science | 7 | 3% | 241 | 51% | Leapfrog Geo |
| Engineering (non-software) | 5 | 2% | 68 | 14% | Leapfrog Geo |
| IT operations & business systems | 3 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 3 | 1% | 3 | 1% | even |
| Healthcare clinical | – | – | 45 | 10% | outside top 12 |
| Quality, safety & environment | – | – | 15 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Construction and civil | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Healthcare support and caregiving | – | – | 3 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Business development & strategy | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Finance & accounting | – | – | 1 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using GDAL →
Companies using Leapfrog Geo →
gis software ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Leapfrog Geo is named by 119 companies in job postings and GDAL by 108; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gdal-vs-leapfrog-geo)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
GDAL vs Leapfrog Geo: questions
Which is more used, GDAL or Leapfrog Geo?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Leapfrog Geo (119) over GDAL (108). By website-and-DNS footprint, Leapfrog Geo (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses GDAL?
66% of GDAL companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 26% for Leapfrog Geo. 21% of GDAL companies have over 1,000 employees, against 52% for Leapfrog Geo.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually GDAL in marketing and Leapfrog Geo in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on GDAL or Leapfrog Geo. Start free, no card.