GDB VS Visual Studio Code
As of 30 October 2026, Visual Studio Code is named by 885 companies and GDB by 206; GDB skews to companies under 200 people (41% vs 41%), Visual Studio Code to companies over 1,000 (36% vs 34%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GDB's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Visual Studio Code rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- GDB: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- Visual Studio Code: 2–200 employees
- 41%
- GDB: 1,000+ employees
- 34%
- Visual Studio Code: 1,000+ employees
- 36%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.3 · 2.6
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | GDB | share | Visual Studio Code | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-employed | 3 | 1% | 9 | 1% | even |
| 2-10 employees | 9 | 4% | 49 | 6% | even |
| 11-50 employees | 31 | 15% | 144 | 16% | even |
| 51-200 employees | 45 | 22% | 172 | 19% | GDB |
| 201-500 employees | 27 | 13% | 118 | 13% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 20 | 10% | 75 | 8% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 28 | 14% | 168 | 19% | Visual Studio Code |
| 5001-10000 employees | 8 | 4% | 42 | 5% | even |
| 10,001+ employees | 35 | 17% | 108 | 12% | GDB |
| Segment | GDB | share | Visual Studio Code | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Technology & software | 80 | 39% | 399 | 45% | Visual Studio Code |
| Manufacturing & industry | 75 | 36% | 135 | 15% | GDB |
| Business & finance services | 22 | 11% | 187 | 21% | Visual Studio Code |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 11 | 5% | 16 | 2% | GDB |
| Automotive | 5 | 2% | 9 | 1% | even |
| Media & content | 4 | 2% | 27 | 3% | even |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 1% | 29 | 3% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 2 | 1% | 30 | 3% | Visual Studio Code |
| Public, community & associations | 2 | 1% | 26 | 3% | even |
| Property & construction | 1 | 0% | 8 | 1% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 1 | 0% | 11 | 1% | even |
| Health care | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GDB | share | Visual Studio Code | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 145 | 70% | 474 | 54% | GDB |
| United Kingdom | 15 | 7% | 50 | 6% | even |
| France | 8 | 4% | 38 | 4% | even |
| Germany | 7 | 3% | 93 | 11% | Visual Studio Code |
| India | 5 | 2% | 28 | 3% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 30 | 3% | even |
| Sweden | 4 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Poland | 3 | 1% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Finland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Australia | 1 | 0% | 10 | 1% | even |
| Italy | – | – | 23 | 3% | outside top 12 |
| Netherlands | – | – | 21 | 2% | outside top 12 |
| Japan | – | – | 9 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 7 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GDB | share | Visual Studio Code | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Software engineering | 553 | 64% | 1,713 | 59% | GDB |
| Engineering (non-software) | 110 | 13% | 89 | 3% | GDB |
| IT operations & business systems | 100 | 12% | 260 | 9% | GDB |
| Data & AI | 12 | 1% | 269 | 9% | Visual Studio Code |
| Finance & accounting | 2 | 0% | 20 | 1% | even |
| Construction and civil | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Customer service & success | 1 | 0% | 33 | 1% | even |
| Design & UX | 1 | 0% | 19 | 1% | even |
| Logistics warehouse and transport | 1 | 0% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Product, program & project management | 1 | 0% | 79 | 3% | Visual Studio Code |
| Sales | 1 | 0% | 26 | 1% | even |
| Marketing & communications | – | – | 16 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 11 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 10 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using GDB →
Companies using Visual Studio Code →
ides editors debuggers ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Visual Studio Code is named by 885 companies in job postings and GDB by 206; 0 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gdb-vs-visual-studio-code)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
GDB vs Visual Studio Code: questions
Which is more used, GDB or Visual Studio Code?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, Visual Studio Code (885) over GDB (206). By website-and-DNS footprint, Visual Studio Code (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses GDB?
41% of GDB companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 41% for Visual Studio Code. 34% of GDB companies have over 1,000 employees, against 36% for Visual Studio Code.
Do companies run both?
0 companies name both in their postings, usually GDB in marketing and Visual Studio Code in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on GDB or Visual Studio Code. Start free, no card.