GDSII VS Siemens EDA
As of 30 October 2026, Siemens EDA is named by 139 companies and GDSII by 177; GDSII skews to companies under 200 people (50% vs 35%), Siemens EDA to companies over 1,000 (42% vs 29%).
As of 30 October 2026 · refreshed daily · counts move as websites, DNS and career sites are re-read.
The website-and-DNS footprint is not comparable between a marketing suite and a CRM: GDSII's script and mail records show on hundreds of thousands of small sites, Siemens EDA rarely leaves a trace outside its own apps. Compare on the job-posting numbers; use the footprint for reach.
- GDSII: 2–200 employees
- 50%
- Siemens EDA: 2–200 employees
- 35%
- GDSII: 1,000+ employees
- 29%
- Siemens EDA: 1,000+ employees
- 42%
- Postings per company, 90 days
- 3.7 · 6.2
- Website or DNS footprint
- 0 · 0
Who chooses which
Share of each tool's companies in every segment. "Leans" marks a gap of more than two points.
| Segment | GDSII | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2-10 employees | 19 | 11% | 10 | 7% | GDSII |
| 11-50 employees | 38 | 21% | 20 | 14% | GDSII |
| 51-200 employees | 31 | 18% | 19 | 14% | GDSII |
| 201-500 employees | 24 | 14% | 19 | 14% | even |
| 501-1000 employees | 13 | 7% | 10 | 7% | even |
| 1001-5000 employees | 21 | 12% | 23 | 17% | Siemens EDA |
| 5001-10000 employees | 6 | 3% | 8 | 6% | Siemens EDA |
| 10,001+ employees | 25 | 14% | 28 | 20% | Siemens EDA |
| Self-employed | – | – | 2 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GDSII | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manufacturing & industry | 51 | 29% | 84 | 60% | Siemens EDA |
| Hospitality & travel | 42 | 24% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Technology & software | 41 | 23% | 17 | 12% | GDSII |
| Business & finance services | 15 | 8% | 21 | 15% | Siemens EDA |
| Automotive | 6 | 3% | 5 | 4% | even |
| Public, community & associations | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Media & content | 5 | 3% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Transport, logistics & rental | 5 | 3% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Consumer services & leisure | 3 | 2% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Property & construction | 2 | 1% | 2 | 1% | even |
| Commerce & trade | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Utilities & infrastructure | 1 | 1% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Segment | GDSII | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| United States | 95 | 54% | 89 | 64% | Siemens EDA |
| United Kingdom | 19 | 11% | 6 | 4% | GDSII |
| France | 10 | 6% | 8 | 6% | even |
| India | 9 | 5% | 7 | 5% | even |
| Germany | 8 | 5% | 9 | 6% | even |
| Canada | 4 | 2% | 3 | 2% | even |
| Australia | 3 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Spain | 3 | 2% | 1 | 1% | even |
| Austria | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Greece | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| United Arab Emirates | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Belgium | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Switzerland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Czechia | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Finland | – | – | 1 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Segment | GDSII | share | Siemens EDA | share | Leans |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Engineering (non-software) | 449 | 52% | 873 | 83% | Siemens EDA |
| Travel, leisure & events | 77 | 9% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Software engineering | 56 | 6% | 38 | 4% | GDSII |
| Product, program & project management | 26 | 3% | 5 | 0% | GDSII |
| Finance & accounting | 16 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Hospitality and food service | 16 | 2% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| IT operations & business systems | 16 | 2% | 7 | 1% | even |
| Customer service & success | 14 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Data & AI | 13 | 2% | 13 | 1% | even |
| Skilled trades and field service | 13 | 2% | 2 | 0% | even |
| Sales | 12 | 1% | 19 | 2% | even |
| Research and science | 5 | 1% | – | – | outside top 12 |
| Design & UX | – | – | 6 | 1% | outside top 12 |
| Arts media and entertainment | – | – | 3 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Education & training | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
| Unclassified | – | – | 2 | 0% | outside top 12 |
The companies behind each column
Companies using GDSII →
Companies using Siemens EDA →
semiconductor eda ranked →
Quote the sentence with the date and the link. The numbers change daily; the link always shows the current ones.
Siemens EDA is named by 139 companies in job postings and GDSII by 177; 15 name both. (Breaknorm, 30 October 2026, https://breaknorm.co/compare/gdsii-vs-siemens-eda)
Read from the source, not self-reported
Every number on this page can be traced to a page we crawled or a posting we read. Full methodology →
- Job postingsRead hourly from career sites. A tool counts when the employer's own text names it as the team's system; both tools can count for one company.
- Website and DNSScripts and embeds on the company's pages, plus SPF, DKIM, MX and CNAME records of its domain that point at the vendor.
- SegmentsCountry, size and industry from the company profile built from its website.
- Not a reviewNo ratings, prices or feature claims. For those, read the vendors.
GDSII vs Siemens EDA: questions
Which is more used, GDSII or Siemens EDA?
By companies naming it in their own job postings, GDSII (177) over Siemens EDA (139). By website-and-DNS footprint, Siemens EDA (0 vs 0), because its scripts and mail records sit on many small company sites.
Who chooses GDSII?
50% of GDSII companies have 2 to 200 employees, against 35% for Siemens EDA. 29% of GDSII companies have over 1,000 employees, against 42% for Siemens EDA.
Do companies run both?
15 companies name both in their postings, usually GDSII in marketing and Siemens EDA in sales, or during a migration.
Where do these numbers come from?
From the employer's own text in job postings read hourly from career sites, and from scripts found on company websites in our crawl. No vendor data, no surveys.
Get either list your way
The same data as a search, over MCP and the API, as bulk files, or pushed to you as it changes.
Every company on either tool,
with the person who owns it
Filter on GDSII or Siemens EDA. Start free, no card.